Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning

Abstract

This article explores the strengths and weaknesses of Lave and Wenger's concept of 'legitimate peripheral participation' as a means of understanding workplace learning. It draws on recent ESRC-funded research by the authors in contemporary workplace settings in the UK (manufacturing industry and secondary schools) to establish the extent to which Lave and Wenger's theories can adequately illuminate the nature and process of learning at work. The new research presented here, which was located in complex institutional settings, highlights the diverse nature of patterns and forms of participation. Case study evidence is used to identify individual and contextual factors which underpin and illuminate the ways in which employees learn. The paper argues that whilst Lave and Wenger's work continues to provide an important source of theoretical insight and inspiration for research in to learning at work, it has significant limitations. These limitations relate to the application of their perspective to contemporary workplaces in advanced industrial societies and to the institutional environments in which people work. These complex settings play a crucial role in the configuration of opportunities and barriers to learning that employees encounter.

Becoming a university lecturer in teacher education: expert school teachers reconstructing their pedagogy and identity

“…Learning within informal situations is seen as critical (Eraut, 2000) although more formal support may also play a role (Fuller, Hodkinson, Hodkinson & Unwin, 2005). Previous work investigating academic induction and university departments as workplaces (Trowler & Knight, 2000;Knight, Tait & Yorke, 2006) signals the importance of the quality of day-to-day interaction and of departmental leadership.…”

Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work‐place learning of clinical experts as newcomers

“…The situated learning literature signals the need to focus on professional learning that is rooted in the workplace context and on the learning of newcomers as they interact with experienced colleagues within a community of practice (Lave & Wenger, 1991;Wenger, 1998). It emphasises the importance of workplace learning in non-formal situations (Eraut, 2000) but the potential contribution of more formal support also needs to be considered (Fuller et al, 2005). Wenger (1998) presents a model of the professional learning of new entrants to a complex workplace as one requiring boundary crossing within an overlapping constellation of communities of practice.…”

Athlete learning in Olympic sport

“…The cultural perspective of learning has been employed to study educational settings (Bloomer & Hodkinson, 1999;, professional contexts (Fuller, Hodkinson, Hodkinson, & Unwin, 2005; and different life phases (Bloomer & Hodkinson, 2000;Hodkinson, 2010;Hodkinson, Ford, Hodkinson, & Hawthorn, 2008;Hodkinson et al, 1996). Recently, the perspective has also been generative in the study of learning in high-performance sport (Barker-Ruchti & Schubring, in press; Rossi, Rynne, & Rabjohns, in press).…”