2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Arabic in Scandinavia: Motivation, metacognition, and autonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Learner autonomy is a form of learning that requires self-control, self-discipline, and selfdirection. Also, learner autonomy can be a learner's ability to become independent learners employing metacognition, motivation, and behavior in carrying out the learning process (Calafato, 2020;Haque, 2019). Learner autonomy has two main components, that is ability and will.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learner autonomy is a form of learning that requires self-control, self-discipline, and selfdirection. Also, learner autonomy can be a learner's ability to become independent learners employing metacognition, motivation, and behavior in carrying out the learning process (Calafato, 2020;Haque, 2019). Learner autonomy has two main components, that is ability and will.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is awareness to study diligently so that the achievement index is good, awareness to compete so that they have competitiveness, awareness to participate in non-academic activities to channel interests and talents, and encourage leadership through activeness in student organizations. Awareness of achievement as a self-strength must be triggered by its emergence through various stimuli of learning activities (Backfisch et al, 2020;Calafato, 2020;Lothian et al, 2020). According to Picture 4, the average student achievement index is 3.28 from the range of 0.00 to 4.00, which means it is in a good category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers develop a number of valid instruments to measure learner autonomy in different learning phases ( Xu et al, 2004 ; Macaskill and Taylor, 2010 ; Oguz, 2013 ; Lin and Reinders, 2019 ), and investigate students’ and teachers’ beliefs, perceptions and readiness for learner autonomy in various educational contexts ( Tanyeli and Kuter, 2013 ; Xiang and Wu, 2016 ; Bozkurt and Arslan, 2018 ; Lin and Reinders, 2019 ). There are a number of studies showing the close relationship between leaner autonomy and other key issues in learning and teaching, such as motivation ( Huang and Liaw, 2007 ; Nakata, 2010 ; Calafato, 2020 ), self-regulation ( Stefanou et al, 2013 ), learner achievement ( Ghorbandordinejad and Nasab, 2016 ), teachers’ behavior and instruction ( Grosmann and Wilde, 2020 ), language policy ( Rivers, 2011 ; Phan and Hamid, 2016 ), and technology ( Reinders and White, 2011 ; Lai, 2019 ; Stockwell and Reinders, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%