2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icalt49669.2020.00047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and Social Networks - Similarities, Differences and Impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the meta-analysis further confirmed these findings and showed that diffusion centralities had higher combined correlation coefficients, narrower confidence intervals, and higher predictive intervals, thus offering solid proof of the robustness and consistency of diffusion centrality measures as indicators of success as well as reflective of the relevance of diffusion-based centrality measures to collaborative context. This can be explained by the fact diffusion centralities capture the role of students in generating reply-worthy promising ideas that are more likely to be taken up as well as they generate longer threads and engagement of others (Chen & Zhang, 2016;Lee & Tan, 2017a;Poquet et al, 2020;Saqr & Montero, 2020;Suthers, 2015;Suthers & Desiato, 2012). Students who can generate such contributions are more likely to be more engaged, more participatory or high achievers (Anderson et al, 2001;de-Marcos et al, 2016;Reychav et al, 2018;Saqr & Montero, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the meta-analysis further confirmed these findings and showed that diffusion centralities had higher combined correlation coefficients, narrower confidence intervals, and higher predictive intervals, thus offering solid proof of the robustness and consistency of diffusion centrality measures as indicators of success as well as reflective of the relevance of diffusion-based centrality measures to collaborative context. This can be explained by the fact diffusion centralities capture the role of students in generating reply-worthy promising ideas that are more likely to be taken up as well as they generate longer threads and engagement of others (Chen & Zhang, 2016;Lee & Tan, 2017a;Poquet et al, 2020;Saqr & Montero, 2020;Suthers, 2015;Suthers & Desiato, 2012). Students who can generate such contributions are more likely to be more engaged, more participatory or high achievers (Anderson et al, 2001;de-Marcos et al, 2016;Reychav et al, 2018;Saqr & Montero, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the fact diffusion centralities capture the role of students in generating reply-worthy promising ideas that are more likely to be taken up as well as they generate longer threads and engagement of others (Chen & Zhang, 2016;Lee & Tan, 2017a;Poquet et al, 2020;Saqr & Montero, 2020;Suthers, 2015;Suthers & Desiato, 2012). Students who can generate such contributions are more likely to be more engaged, more participatory or high achievers (Anderson et al, 2001;de-Marcos et al, 2016;Reychav et al, 2018;Saqr & Montero, 2020). Diffusion-based centralities capture extra information (length of threads, the range of involvement of others and possibility of uptake), as such they are more likely to accurately reflect a realistic view of students' efforts in the discourse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network analyses in this review indicated that collaboration in online courses and clinical clerkship occurred primarily among students and less frequently between students and teachers. 42,[44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52][54][55][56][57] SNA also demonstrated which students had the most connections (in the structured courses) and which students were more isolated. [44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52]56 A subset of studies found that social networks established in structured courses and clinical clerkship changed over time.…”
Section: Use Of Sna and Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…42,[44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52][54][55][56][57] SNA also demonstrated which students had the most connections (in the structured courses) and which students were more isolated. [44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52]56 A subset of studies found that social networks established in structured courses and clinical clerkship changed over time. 30,31,37,45,46,48,51 In 4 studies, the role of the instructor became less central, the connections among students increased, and the number of isolated students decreased.…”
Section: Use Of Sna and Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation