2015
DOI: 10.3233/web-150326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and relearning of target decision strategies in continuous coordinated cleaning tasks with shallow coordination1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The route is then divided into fragments and allocated to individual agents to minimize the working time. Yoneda et al [21] proposed a distributed method in which agents autonomously decide their search/exploration strategies in a multi-robot sweeping problem using reinforcement learning. Sampaio et al [17] proposed the gravity-based model in which the locals that were not visited for a long time have the stronger gravity, and thus, agents tend to visit such locations for uniform patrolling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The route is then divided into fragments and allocated to individual agents to minimize the working time. Yoneda et al [21] proposed a distributed method in which agents autonomously decide their search/exploration strategies in a multi-robot sweeping problem using reinforcement learning. Sampaio et al [17] proposed the gravity-based model in which the locals that were not visited for a long time have the stronger gravity, and thus, agents tend to visit such locations for uniform patrolling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach is for agents to share the working area and clean it in a coordinated manner. For example, agents could patrol the area by using different cleaning algorithms or different visitation cycles to uniformly cover the entire area [5], [13], [21]. Another strategy for this approach is for the agents to move around the area in formation (e.g., Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%