2010
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2010.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and Predicting the Evolution of Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, four classical proximity scores based on neighborhood were considered: PA, CN, AA and JC. These are very popular measures used in the state of the art of link prediction (Bringmann et al, 2010;Lichtenwalter et al, 2010). Each measure is explained below.…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, four classical proximity scores based on neighborhood were considered: PA, CN, AA and JC. These are very popular measures used in the state of the art of link prediction (Bringmann et al, 2010;Lichtenwalter et al, 2010). Each measure is explained below.…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link prediction task was then accomplished by deploying extended versions of the proximity measures adequate for weighted networks (e.g., weighted Adamic Adar). Bringmann, Berlingerio, Bonchi, and Gionis (2010) proposed to mine network data augmented with temporal information in order to discover association rules (in terms of frequent subgraphs) that best explained the network evolution. In Juszczyszyn, Musial, and Budka (2011), the authors adopted a related approach in which the history of the network (recorded during past time windows) is used to derive probabilities of transitions between triads of nodes.…”
Section: Link Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rules are then abstracted into patterns representing the dynamics of graphs. Berlingerio et al (2009) extract patterns based on frequency and derive evolution rules to solve prediction problems in Bringmann et al (2010). All these works only focus on the graph structure and do not consider attributes related to the vertices and/or the edges.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This partially explains why graph mining has generated considerable interests in terms of both fundamental and applied research. A striking feature is its ability to allow better understanding of social interactions and to provide support for many tasks such as social recommendations (Jiang et al 2012), community discovery (Girvan and Newman 2002), social influence propagation (Goyal et al 2013), and link prediction (Bringmann et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works which consider dynamic networks are Bringmann et al (2010) and Bliss et al (2013). In Bringmann et al (2010), association rules and frequentpattern mining are used to search for typical patterns of structural changes in dynamic networks. The authors developed the Graph Evolution Rule Miner to extract such rules and applied these rules to predict future network evolution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%