2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women's university in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
62
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They clustered students into four groups based on self-reported SRL data and found their actual learning patterns in gStudy differed substantially, even among students from the same cluster. Kim, et al (2018) made a similar comparison among undergraduates in Korea. They analysed online trace data from 284 undergraduate students enrolled in an asynchronous online statistics course.…”
Section: Status Of Research On Srl Combining Self-reports and Online mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They clustered students into four groups based on self-reported SRL data and found their actual learning patterns in gStudy differed substantially, even among students from the same cluster. Kim, et al (2018) made a similar comparison among undergraduates in Korea. They analysed online trace data from 284 undergraduate students enrolled in an asynchronous online statistics course.…”
Section: Status Of Research On Srl Combining Self-reports and Online mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study compares multiple cohorts, which yields insight in continuity and change of strategy use with the constant evolvement of course design. Secondly, the few studies that have been comparing self-reports and online trace data so far dealt with relatively small sample sizes (Cho & Yoo, 2017;Guerra et al, 2016;Hadwin et al, 2007;Kim et al, 2018) or did not measure the full range of self-motivational beliefs and strategies with self-reports (Hadwin et al, 2007;Cho & Yoo, 2017). As a result, there is no clarity, yet, on the relevance and actionability of online trace data in comparison to inventories on motivation, strategy use, and self-regulation.…”
Section: Research Questions and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and effectiveness of decision processes can be greatly enhanced using educational data mining [27], and likewise, vital feedbacks from students can also be evaluated using data mining techniques in order to identify lapses, areas of need and improvement in teaching and learning processes. Through data mining techniques, students can be classified into unique groups based on well-defined criteria to enable the deployment of purposespecific and targeted learning interventions, and for identifying common skill set, social attitudes, learning behaviours [28,29] and interests [30,31]. The effectiveness of academic modules and the developments of new contents can also be evaluated using data mining techniques [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going forward, it seems that the emphasis on behaviours will only deepen because technological innovation in online learning systems is likely to improve the access, quality and use of computer-generated logs of learner behaviours (Ben-Eliyahu & Bernacki, 2015). After all, behavioural involvement is the only facet of learning that leaves 'visible' traces online and thus generates research data that are relatively easy to capture and incorporate in pedagogical research (Kim, Yoon, Jo, & Branch, 2018).…”
Section: Interactivity In Online Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Insert Table 2 here] For each participating student, we collected evidence from the learning platform (Moodle) that reflected their online activity and captured the intensity of their behavioural engagement with eLearning. In line with previous studies (Huang et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2018;Shaw, 2012), the evidence included system logs (the total number of logs during the eight weeks or the number of times student entered the learning platform, the pattern of logs over time, and time on the platform) and other evidence of their activity (e.g. posts, replies, uploads of files, quizzes, downloads, video views).…”
Section: [Insert Figure1 Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%