Learning analytics as data ecology: a tentative proposal

Abstract

Central to the institutionalization of learning analytics is the need to understand and improve student learning. Frameworks guiding the implementation of learning analytics flow from and perpetuate specific understandings of learning. Crucially, they also provide insights into how learning analytics acknowledges and positions itself as entangled in institutional data ecosystems, and (increasingly) as part of a data ecology driven by a variety of data interests. The success of learning analytics should therefore be understood in terms of data flows and data interests informing the emerging and mutually constitutive interrelationships and interdependencies between different stakeholders, interests and power relations. This article analyses several selected frameworks to determine the extent to which learning analytics understands itself as a data ecosystem with dynamic interdependencies and interrelationships (human and non-human). Secondly, as learning analytics increasingly becomes part of broader data ecologies, we examine the extent to which learning analytics takes cognizance of the reality, the potential and the risks of being part of a broader data ecology. Finally, this article examines the different data interests vested in learning analytics and critically considers implications for student data sovereignty. The research found that most of the analyzed frameworks understand learning analytics as a data ecosystem, with very little evidence of a broader data ecological understanding. The vast majority of analyzed frameworks consider student data as valuable resource without considering student data ownership and their data rights for self-determination.

Food for thought: an analogy for digital sovereignty in education

“…The symbolic realm encompasses in this study anything that codifies elements specific to the educational purpose. At this level, the advancement of technology in our societies raises novel questions, such as what knowledge is held valuable and what sources of knowledge are deemed valid [1], or what educational objects better support its purpose -be it infrastructure [4,5], resources [6], pedagogies [7], technologies such as AI [8] or analytics [9][10][11], to name a few.…”

Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet of Intelligence of Things in Higher Education—Towards Bridging Theory and Practice

“…Ref. [68] provide a review of how LA started by proposing frameworks that are generic as well as specific which relate to such areas as data protection, personalized learning, and student retention.…”

In my opinion, the TOS… Situating personal data literacy interventions

“…In the above-mentioned context, the problem of data practices that are not transparent and might interfere with the user's privacy and agency has become central. If data is collected massively and in intrusive ways, leading to forms of manipulation or, even worse, neglecting learners' diverse identities (Prinsloo, 2020), several levels of intervention are necessary to deal with the problem. The educational response should cover interventions supporting learners and educators understanding of the conundrums of data privacy, inter alia, their ability to explore the tools' affordances; to see the space for negotiation about the data collected, processed and shared throughout the technological systems; and finally, to claim their rights to protect their privacy and agency.…”