2020
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab2373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning across multi-stimulus enhances target recognition methods in SSVEP-based BCIs

Abstract: Objective. Latest target recognition methods that are equipped with learning from the subject’s calibration data, represented by the extended canonical correlation analysis (eCCA) and the ensemble task-related component analysis (eTRCA), can achieve extra high performance in the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), however their performance deteriorate drastically if the calibration trials are insufficient. This paper develops a new scheme to learn from limited c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
84
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on whether a calibration or training phase is required for the extraction of spatial filters, the signal detection methods can be categorized into supervised methods and training-free methods. The supervised methods exploit an optimal spatial filter by a training procedure and achieve the state-of-the-art classification performance in the SSVEP-based BCI (Nakanishi et al, 2018;Wong et al, 2020a). These spatial filters or projection direction can be learned by exploiting individual training template (Bin et al, 2011), reference signal optimization (Zhang et al, 2013), interfrequency variation (Yin et al, 2015), and ensemble reference signals (Nakanishi et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015a) in the framework of canonical correlation analysis (CCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on whether a calibration or training phase is required for the extraction of spatial filters, the signal detection methods can be categorized into supervised methods and training-free methods. The supervised methods exploit an optimal spatial filter by a training procedure and achieve the state-of-the-art classification performance in the SSVEP-based BCI (Nakanishi et al, 2018;Wong et al, 2020a). These spatial filters or projection direction can be learned by exploiting individual training template (Bin et al, 2011), reference signal optimization (Zhang et al, 2013), interfrequency variation (Yin et al, 2015), and ensemble reference signals (Nakanishi et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015a) in the framework of canonical correlation analysis (CCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spatial filters or projection direction can be learned by exploiting individual training template (Bin et al, 2011), reference signal optimization (Zhang et al, 2013), interfrequency variation (Yin et al, 2015), and ensemble reference signals (Nakanishi et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015a) in the framework of canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Recently, the task-related components (Nakanishi et al, 2018) and the multiple neighboring stimuli (Wong et al, 2020a) have been utilized to derive spatial filters in order to boost the discriminative power of the learned model further. On the other hand, the trainingfree methods perform feature extraction and classification in one step without the training session in the online BCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in [29], the signal quality of the dataset will influence the estimate of covariance matrices in the CCA-based methods. Therefore, due to the relatively weak SSVEP responses in the proposed paradigm, the obtained spatial filters in the present study may be not as effective as those from traditional SSVEP studies [30], where the stimuli were directly attended. Consequently, a relatively longer time is needed to make a reliable classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…First of all, by constructing spatial filters to make the neural patterns evoked by stimulus at different locations more distinguishable with methods like common spatial patterns [31] and DCPM [32], it is possible to enhance the recognition performance in the proposed paradigm. Furthermore, as an increasing training sample size is expected to boost the classification accuracy in CCA-based methods [30], using more training trials for each direction or exploiting of the training data from other subjects may also improve the average accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, indicates the number of channels, is the number of sampling points and is the spatial filter vector. The spatial filter generated by TRCA has shown excellent performance in recent SSVEP-based BCI systems [ 25 , 30 , 33 ]. For frequency i , the TRCA aims to maximize the reproducibility from trial to trial: where h indicates the index of training trials, and is the number of training trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%