Abstract:Previous research has shown that when asked to rate their agreement with statements regarding their attitudes towards participation in psychological experiments, students reported that their participation was of educational value (e.g., Bowman and Waite, 2003; Landrum and Chastain, 1995). We investigated what kinds of learning experiences students would report when prompted with open ended questions regarding their participation. Four open ended questions asked how seriously participants took the research expe… Show more
“…Mandatory research participation is a common component in undergraduate psychology research programs, primarily justified on the basis of enhancing student experience by promoting insight into research methods, processes, and findings (Chin & Gibbs Stayte, 2015; Darling et al, 2007; Landrum & Chastain, 1995; Moyer & Franklin, 2011; VanWormer et al, 2014). Although there is a growing body of literature surrounding why student choose to engage (or not) with research in general (Bowman & Waite, 2003; Elicker et al, 2010; Rocchi et al, 2016), previous research has not examined how choices are made to select specific studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that have measured actual learning have found that research participation increases knowledge to a similar extent as lecture attendance (Elliott, Rice, Trafimow, Madson, & Hipshur, 2010) and is especially beneficial for increasing understanding of research procedures, research ethics, and the diversity of psychology as a discipline (Bowman & Waite, 2003; Rosell et al, 2005). Participating in research has also been associated with self-perceived increases in understanding of the specific experimental topic (Darling, Goedert, Ceynar, Shore, & Anderson, 2007; Moyer & Franklin, 2011), psychology more generally (Chin & Gibbs Stayte, 2015; Landrum & Chastain, 1995), and research methods and processes (Chin & Gibbs Stayte, 2015; Darling et al, 2007; VanWormer et al, 2014). Perceived benefits appear to be slightly lower if research participation is mandatory compared with when it is voluntary (Nimmer & Handelsman, 1992; Roberts & Allen, 2013).…”
It is a common, if controversial, practice to recruit undergraduate psychology students as research participants. There is substantial research concerning putative educational benefits for students, but as students increasingly have freedom to choose between studies to meet participation requirements, factors underlying student choice of participation activities have been understudied. This research was designed to gain insight into what influences students’ choice of research participation activities. Respondents were first-year psychology students at a research-intensive university. In Study 1, 43 students provided open-ended responses reflecting on their participation experience. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes. In Study 2, 135 students completed a short questionnaire designed using the themes extracted in Study 1, with additional questions to probe self-reported and actual learning via questions about study contents and procedure. Across both studies, the dominant reasons for choosing a particular study were interest and convenience. However, 29% of respondents in Study 2 indicated that they had not learned anything during participation. This suggests that it is beneficial to offer a wide range of potential studies as students can tailor participation to match their interests, but improved debriefing strategies may be required to ensure students derive educational benefit and understand what they learned.
“…Mandatory research participation is a common component in undergraduate psychology research programs, primarily justified on the basis of enhancing student experience by promoting insight into research methods, processes, and findings (Chin & Gibbs Stayte, 2015; Darling et al, 2007; Landrum & Chastain, 1995; Moyer & Franklin, 2011; VanWormer et al, 2014). Although there is a growing body of literature surrounding why student choose to engage (or not) with research in general (Bowman & Waite, 2003; Elicker et al, 2010; Rocchi et al, 2016), previous research has not examined how choices are made to select specific studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that have measured actual learning have found that research participation increases knowledge to a similar extent as lecture attendance (Elliott, Rice, Trafimow, Madson, & Hipshur, 2010) and is especially beneficial for increasing understanding of research procedures, research ethics, and the diversity of psychology as a discipline (Bowman & Waite, 2003; Rosell et al, 2005). Participating in research has also been associated with self-perceived increases in understanding of the specific experimental topic (Darling, Goedert, Ceynar, Shore, & Anderson, 2007; Moyer & Franklin, 2011), psychology more generally (Chin & Gibbs Stayte, 2015; Landrum & Chastain, 1995), and research methods and processes (Chin & Gibbs Stayte, 2015; Darling et al, 2007; VanWormer et al, 2014). Perceived benefits appear to be slightly lower if research participation is mandatory compared with when it is voluntary (Nimmer & Handelsman, 1992; Roberts & Allen, 2013).…”
It is a common, if controversial, practice to recruit undergraduate psychology students as research participants. There is substantial research concerning putative educational benefits for students, but as students increasingly have freedom to choose between studies to meet participation requirements, factors underlying student choice of participation activities have been understudied. This research was designed to gain insight into what influences students’ choice of research participation activities. Respondents were first-year psychology students at a research-intensive university. In Study 1, 43 students provided open-ended responses reflecting on their participation experience. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes. In Study 2, 135 students completed a short questionnaire designed using the themes extracted in Study 1, with additional questions to probe self-reported and actual learning via questions about study contents and procedure. Across both studies, the dominant reasons for choosing a particular study were interest and convenience. However, 29% of respondents in Study 2 indicated that they had not learned anything during participation. This suggests that it is beneficial to offer a wide range of potential studies as students can tailor participation to match their interests, but improved debriefing strategies may be required to ensure students derive educational benefit and understand what they learned.
“…Previous research has consistently shown that undergraduate students perceive their experience of participating in psychological studies as educational, positive, and beneficial to them (Bowman & Waite, 2003; Darling et al, 2007; Elliot et al, 2010; Landrum & Chastain, 1995; Rosell et al, 2005; VanWormer et al, 2014). For example, VanWormer and colleagues (2014) found that undergraduate students reported increased understanding of, and interest in, research after participating in studies.…”
Section: Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions Of Participating In Psycmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Darling and colleagues (2007) provides some suggestion that students might learn about more than just the process of research from participating in research studies. In response to open-ended questions, they asked undergraduate students to write about what they gained from participating in studies.…”
Section: Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions Of Participating In Psycmentioning
Researchers often rely on undergraduate students to participate in psychological studies and so ethical guidelines state that there must be educational value to their participation. In previous studies that have asked undergraduates whether they felt they learned something new from participating in research, students have generally said yes. However, we know relatively little about what specifically they are learning. The current study aimed to extend previous research by asking undergraduate participants ( N = 479), who had all taken part in at least one psychology study, to indicate whether and what they learned about the research process, themselves, or other people as a result of their participation. Participants were also asked to recommend ways to make participating in studies more educational. Our findings suggest that the majority of participants are learning from their participation, most often about the design or process of research but also sometimes about their own psychology or that of other people. Based on students’ feedback, we provide specific recommendations for further improving the educational potential of studies.
“…Those first year students who participated in research reported an increment understanding psychological research procedures as well as an increment understanding contemporary psychology. Although the methods used have usually been based in self-reports, some researchers have investigated if the students get any type of learning benefit after their participation in a certain research (Darling et al, 2007;Rosell et al, 2005). One of the most common results found is that students usually report that they learn not only about psychological content but also about the process of conducting psychological research (Darling et al, 2007).…”
Section: Research Participation Improves Student's Exam Performancementioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.