2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.020504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning a Local Hamiltonian from Local Measurements

Abstract: Recovering an unknown Hamiltonian from measurements is an increasingly important task for certification of noisy quantum devices and simulators. Recent works have succeeded in recovering the Hamiltonian of an isolated quantum system with local interactions from long-ranged correlators of a single eigenstate. Here, we show that such Hamiltonians can be recovered from local observables alone, using computational and measurement resources scaling linearly with the system size. In fact, to recover the Hamiltonian … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
156
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
156
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery error Δ we find in figure 1(a) is slightly higher (by a factor of »1.25) than the estimate of equation (8), derived in [40]. In contrast to our results in this work, the recovery error obtained in [40] was lower than the prediction of the same estimate, which is indeed expected to be pessimistic due to the use of Jensen's inequality.…”
Section: B2 Recovery Error: Results Versus Expectationcontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The recovery error Δ we find in figure 1(a) is slightly higher (by a factor of »1.25) than the estimate of equation (8), derived in [40]. In contrast to our results in this work, the recovery error obtained in [40] was lower than the prediction of the same estimate, which is indeed expected to be pessimistic due to the use of Jensen's inequality.…”
Section: B2 Recovery Error: Results Versus Expectationcontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…We believe the difference is due to the different noise model used in both papers: here we add noise to each measured observable, while in [40] we added independent noise to each of the entries of K (even when they contain the same observable). This is because in [40], we wished to test the theoretical validity of the error estimate. The estimate assumes that the noise in each entry of the constraint matrix K is independent, and we thus added an independent random noise to each of its entries.…”
Section: B2 Recovery Error: Results Versus Expectationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations