Learner Verification: A Methodology to Create Suitable Education Materials

Abstract

Background: Learner verification and revision (LV&R) is a research methodological approach to inform educational message design with the aim of producing suitable, actionable, and literacy appropriate messages to aid in awareness, adoption of healthy behaviors, and decision-making. It consists of a series of participatory steps that engage users throughout materials development, revision, and refinement. This approach is congruent with Healthy People 2030 communication objectives to improve access to information among diverse, multicultural, multilingual populations, and enhance health care quality toward health equity. Brief description of activity: To illustrate LV&R, we describe its use in three cancer education projects that produced targeted information about (1) inherited breast cancer among African Americans (brochure); (2) colorectal cancer screening among Latinos (photo novella and DVD); and (3) smoking-relapse prevention among patients receiving cancer treatment (video). We discuss rationale for its application in the three exemplars and extrapolate lessons learned from our experiences when using this approach. Implementation: A qualitative approach entailing individual or group-based discussions helped to examine the elements of learner verification (i.e., attraction, comprehension, self-efficacy, cultural acceptability, persuasion). The following steps are reported: (1) preparation of materials, interview guide, and recruitment; (2) interviewing of participants; and (3) evaluation of responses. Data were analyzed by use of a coding system that placed participant responses from each of the elements into data summary matrices. Findings informed revisions and refinement of materials. Results: LV&R was effectively applied across the three cancer education projects to enhance the suitability of the materials. As a result, the materials were improved by using clearer, more salient language to enhance comprehension and cultural acceptability, by integrating design elements such as prompts, headers, and stylistic edits to reduce text density, incorporating preferred colors and graphics to improve aesthetic appeal, and including actionable terms and words to bolster motivation and self-efficacy. Lessons learned: Results suggest that LV&R methodology can improve suitability of education materials through systematic, iterative steps that engage diverse, multicultural, multilingual populations. This approach is a critical participa-tory strategy toward health equity, and is appropriate in a variety of education, research, and clinical practice settings to improve health communications. [ HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice . 2021;5(1):e49–e59.] Plain Language Summary: This article describes the use of a systematic approach called “learner verification” used for developing educational materials. This a...

Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial

“…The formative research encompassed focus groups with 13 Hispanic women, and a survey in 2014–2015 of 213 high-risk Hispanic and non-Hispanic cancer survivors who had obtained genetic testing and received uninformative results, as well as their close biological relatives (Kinney et al, 2018 ). Survey participants offered guidance on the brochure and visual aids in 2015–2016 through Learner Verification and Revision (LV&R), a research approach intended to ensure that educational messages support intended awareness and adoption of health behaviors (Chavarria et al, 2021 ; Kinney et al, 2018 ).…”

A pilot randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase genetic counseling and genetic testing among Latina breast cancer survivors

“…A professional design company formatted the booklet to highlight: a) the importance of GC/GT for Latina BC survivors and their families; b) HBOC risk factors; and c) availability of telephone GC/GT. Finally, 10 high‐risk BC survivors (5 in PR and 5 in Tampa; reviewers were not eligible for subsequent study participation) reviewed the booklet for attractiveness, comprehensibility, cultural acceptability, and persuasiveness using principles of learner verification (Chavarria et al, in press). They regarded the booklet favorably with minimal suggestions for improvement.…”

A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of human papillomavirus self‐sampling and informational materials among diverse populations

“…developed a semi‐structured, open‐ended interview guide to use during the patient interviews. The guide was informed by the Learner Verification and Revision (LVR) model, which is designed for assessment and development of educational materials by assessing concepts such as “attraction” and “cultural‐linguistic acceptability.” 19 The guide included questions about the letter and instructions, asking specifically about the appeal of the screening method (attraction), the participant's ability to understand the information (comprehension), participant confidence in being able to do the test (self‐efficacy), and if the materials were culturally appealing (cultural‐linguistic acceptability). Participants were asked for specific recommendations to the messaging and instructions.…”