2013
DOI: 10.5785/8-1-332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learner variables as predictors of ESL proficiency

Abstract: The fact that some individuals are more successful at acquiring English as an L2 than others has led to investigations of learner characteristics as predictors of ESL proficiency. This paper reports the results of an investigation of the relationship between three learner characteristics, namely Field IndeE.endence/Dependence (FI/D), Language Learning Strategies (LLSs) and Personality Typesjlraits (PT), and ESL proficiency. Pearson product-moment co"elations and canonical co"elations revealed significant relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of EFL learners in various countries revealed evidence that metacognitive strategies are often strong predictors of L2 proficiency (Dreyer & Oxford, 1996).…”
Section: Metacognitive Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of EFL learners in various countries revealed evidence that metacognitive strategies are often strong predictors of L2 proficiency (Dreyer & Oxford, 1996).…”
Section: Metacognitive Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, some researchers have attempted to isolate particular learner variables which might enhance or hinder progress in learning a foreign or second language (Chapelle & Roberts, 1986;Reid, 1987;Wenden & Rubin, 1987; O'Malley & Chamot, 1990; Oxford, 1990;Skehan, 1991). As cited in Dreyer and Vander Walt (1994), various research identified a number of variables that account for some of the differences in how students learn, including attitude and motivation (Gardner & Lambert, 1972;Gardner & Smythe, 1975;Gardner, Smythe, & Brunet, 1977), personality type/traits (Chastain, 1975;Guiora et al, 1975;Brodkey & Shore, 1976;Busch, 1982), learning styles (especially the field dependence/independence distinction) (Witkin et al, 1977a(Witkin et al, , 1977bBirckbichler & Omaggio, 1978;Hosenfeld, 1979;Hansen & Stansfield, 1981, 1982Chapelle & Roberts, 1986;Ried, 1987), and language learning strategies (Bialystok & Frö hlich, 1978;Bialystok, 1981;Wenden, 1983Wenden, , 1986aWenden, , 1986b; O'Malley, Chamot, Stewner-Manzanares, Kupper, & Russo, 1985a, 1985bWenden & Rubin, 1987;Oxford, 1989; O'Malley & Chamot, 1990; Oxford, 1990). By the same token, in recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the necessity in second or foreign language research and teaching to investigate cognitive aspects and gender differences that have undeniable effects on language learning and teaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%