2018
DOI: 10.19171/uefad.505611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learner Characteristics and Opinions about Embedded Systems and Robotic Applications Course: Towards the Design of Instruction

Abstract: Bu çalışmada sunulan verilerden bir kısmı 1. Uluslararası Temel Eğitim Kongresi'nde (UTEK 2018) sözlü bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be said that this approach first started with Papert's use of robots within the educational context (Papert, 1993). It has been stated that in using educational physical programming or robot programming tools, a learning environment can be created that helps foster students' skills in cooperation and communication, as well as in problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity (Eguchi, 2015;Uzun & Uz, 2018). Physical programming tools provide environments where students can both practice and revise the programming knowledge learnt during their lessons, to develop various perspectives by doing activities in other lessons, and reinforce previous and recently acquired knowledge (Cortina et al, 2012;Freudenthal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Constructionist Approaches For Teaching Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be said that this approach first started with Papert's use of robots within the educational context (Papert, 1993). It has been stated that in using educational physical programming or robot programming tools, a learning environment can be created that helps foster students' skills in cooperation and communication, as well as in problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity (Eguchi, 2015;Uzun & Uz, 2018). Physical programming tools provide environments where students can both practice and revise the programming knowledge learnt during their lessons, to develop various perspectives by doing activities in other lessons, and reinforce previous and recently acquired knowledge (Cortina et al, 2012;Freudenthal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Constructionist Approaches For Teaching Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%