The incorporation of self-and peer-assessment and feedback has significant potential as a pedagogical strategy to promote deep learning in project based coursework. This study examined the impact of a deeper approach to learning on pre-service teachers' critical thinking and metacognitive skills. It also examined the impact on student learning outcomes within a project based module with a significant design element. Forty seven students participated in the pilot of an online peer feedback system. Results suggest that the quality of students' reflections through peer feedback and overall satisfaction with the module remained high despite students' citing a preference for instructor feedback. The data also indicate that the incorporation of self-and peer-assessment and feedback resulted in higher quality learning outcomes and enhanced critical thinking skills.Keywords: peer feedback, project based learning, teacher education.
IntroductionThe distinction between deep and surface learning is well established (Entwistle and Ramsden 1982) with deeper approaches to learning associated with higher quality learning outcomes (Trigwell, Prosser and Waterhouse 1999). It is also clear that students' perceptions of their learning environment are related to the approach to learning they adopt (Entwistle 1991;Dow 2006). That deep learning is allied to deeper pedagogical approaches, focusing on teaching for understanding and more importantly personal understanding (Entwistle 2000). However, developments in teaching and learning approaches require equivalent adjustment and advancement of assessment strategies. Biggs (1999, p. 2) stresses the importance of this constructive alignment; "Does the format of assessment match your teaching objectives? If it does match your objectives, the backwash is positive, but if it does not, the backwash will encourage students to use surface approaches to learning". It appears that assessment strategies which encourage students to think for themselves, to become critical and creative thinkers, shift students focus in a class towards a deeper approach to learning (Scouller 1998). Conversely, assessment which encourages memorisation and recall is more likely to result in students adopting a surface approach, especially when combined with perceived heavy -2 -workload demands (Trigwell, Prosser and Waterhouse 1999;Gunderman et al. 2003). It is clear therefore that optimising the role of assessment in education can greatly enhance student learning, especially assessment that moves beyond a summative focus to a more formative purpose Liu and Carless 2006). However, summative approaches to assessment still dominate in education (Knight 2002), especially in the Irish context which employs a matriculation system in the form of a final exam (entitled Leaving Certificate), the results of which are employed for the allocation of university places to students. With such emphasis placed on summative assessment at second level it is not surprising that students are frequently cited as focusing solely on achiev...