Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learned vs. Hand-Crafted Features for Pedestrian Gender Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several works show, that on small-scale datasets with homogenous distribution, performance of handcrafted features can be considered on a par with learned ones. Whereas increased and more heterogeneous datasets lead to superiority of CNNs (Antipov et al, 2015;Fischer et al, 2014). Since we are crawling Street View images, we effectively have a vast amount of training data available -our limiting factor is the availability of correct ground truth for the building use.…”
Section: Street-view Based Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works show, that on small-scale datasets with homogenous distribution, performance of handcrafted features can be considered on a par with learned ones. Whereas increased and more heterogeneous datasets lead to superiority of CNNs (Antipov et al, 2015;Fischer et al, 2014). Since we are crawling Street View images, we effectively have a vast amount of training data available -our limiting factor is the availability of correct ground truth for the building use.…”
Section: Street-view Based Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the gender detection evaluation, we use a pre-trained gender detection method by bodies using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), published in [2]. We evaluate this tool over 1081 videos from the HID database [19], including 864 male videos and 220 female videos.…”
Section: Algorithm Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if mc > 0.5, the gender is predicted as a male otherwise as a female). We apply the gender classifier [2] over the original videos and on the videos where the pixelization, Gaussian blur and body shape filters are applied. The accuracy of the classifier on the original body images is 81 %.…”
Section: Algorithm Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37, we employ a convolutional neural network for gender recognition. In particular, we adopt an architecture proposed by Krizhevsky et al 45 This architecture is presented in Figure 4.…”
Section: Cnn-based Gender Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%