2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learn and ACT: Changing prejudice towards people with mental illness using stigma reduction interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hayes, Bissett, et al (2004) found that their ACT condition had significantly less burnout at follow-up when compared to multicultural training and an educational control. Other studies found that ACT decreased overall prejudice more than an educational control (Kenny & Bizumic, 2016b) and that ACT led to higher positive behavioral intentions than an educational control . Of eight studies that compared ACT to active controls, two reported completely equivalent outcomes for ACT and the control condition (Clarke, Taylor, Bolderston, et al, 2015;, another two found advantages for ACT on some outcomes or for some subgroups (Hayes, Bissett, et al, 2004;Masuda et al, 2007), and four reported that ACT was significantly superior on primary outcomes (Kenny & Bizumic, 2006b;Luoma et al, 2012;Minkesh & Masroor, 2014).…”
Section: Summary Of Main Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Hayes, Bissett, et al (2004) found that their ACT condition had significantly less burnout at follow-up when compared to multicultural training and an educational control. Other studies found that ACT decreased overall prejudice more than an educational control (Kenny & Bizumic, 2016b) and that ACT led to higher positive behavioral intentions than an educational control . Of eight studies that compared ACT to active controls, two reported completely equivalent outcomes for ACT and the control condition (Clarke, Taylor, Bolderston, et al, 2015;, another two found advantages for ACT on some outcomes or for some subgroups (Hayes, Bissett, et al, 2004;Masuda et al, 2007), and four reported that ACT was significantly superior on primary outcomes (Kenny & Bizumic, 2006b;Luoma et al, 2012;Minkesh & Masroor, 2014).…”
Section: Summary Of Main Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Basic characteristics of these studies are presented in Table 2. All studies were conducted in the United States with the exception of two studies conducted in the United Kingdom (Clarke, Taylor, Bolderston, et al, 2015;, one conducted in Australia (Kenny & Bizumic, 2016b), and one conducted in India (Minkesh & Masroor, 2014). The studies vary notably in terms of methodological approach and rigor, including 1 multiple-baseline study, 6 randomized trials with active controls, 1 randomized waitlist-controlled trial, 1 nonrandomized comparison trial, 5 uncontrolled pilot trials, and 1 counterbalanced time-series group study.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Act-based Interventions For Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations