Lean in industry 4.0 is accelerating manufacturing excellence – A DEMATEL analysis

Ojha, Ravindra

doi:10.1108/tqm-11-2021-0318

Cited by 22 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Evaluation scale The Direct-relation matrix was designed using a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = no effect, 1= low effect, 2= moderate effect, 3= high effect, and 4= very high effect). This scale was developed based on the study conducted by [23]. This study involved 15 experts in identifying the relationships among 16 DSCM implementation criteria.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Digital Supply Chain Management in E-procurement Service Usage Using Decision Making Trial Method and Evaluation Laboratory in National Public Procurement Agency

Saesario,

Efrilianda

2023

SJI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to identify the implementation of the digital supply chain and its priority in the National Public Procurement Agency’s e-procurement service. To this end, a quantitative study with Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method using Matlab R2105a. DEMATEL result showed that eight criteria in the dispatcher group became the main priority in DSCM implementation in LKPP’s e-procurement process. In comparison, the other eight criteria in the receiver group serve as the advanced criteria in DSCM implementation. The planning criterion was the most prioritized and the most influential DSCM criterion in LKPP’s e-procurement service, which covers the distribution requirement process. The three most important DSCM criteria in LKPP’s e-procurement service were the distribution requirement process, delivery and inspection, and transportation management. The analysis showed that some DSCM criteria in LKPP’s e-procurement had met the DSCM principle. Further studies using other methods like Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytical Network Process (ANP) are needed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Digital Supply Chain Management in E-procurement Service Usage Using Decision Making Trial Method and Evaluation Laboratory in National Public Procurement Agency

Saesario,

Efrilianda

2023

SJI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This view predominantly focused on enhancing operational efficiency, increasing productivity and streamlining costs (Asif et al , 2022; Szász et al , 2021; Yüksel, 2020). Its core ethos revolved around optimizing processes and performance-related concerns, promoting a technological ecosystem to bolster manufacturing excellence (Ojha, 2023). Closely linked to the industrial perspective is the market-oriented view, which accentuates profit generation (Bai et al , 2022), competitive advantages (Kumar and Bhatia, 2021) and responsiveness to customer needs and expectations (Barata et al , 2023).…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Assumptions Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutionalization and framing of Industry 4.0: a framework for understanding stakeholders and comparing countries

Fogaça,

Grijalvo,

Oliveros Iglesias

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to propose and assess a framework to analyse the institutionalization of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) through a framing analysis. Design/methodology/approach The framework was developed by combining the institutional approach with orders of worth, drawing insights from a comprehensive literature review. To assess it, the authors conducted a qualitative analysis of annual reports from companies with the largest market capitalization over a six-year period and interviewed union representatives in Spain and Sweden. Findings The framework comprises five dimensions (industrial, market, civic, green and connectionist). The empirical results reveal that companies consistently frame I4.0 with an emphasis on industrial and market perspectives. In contrast, unions place a stronger emphasis on civic issues, with Spanish unions holding a more negative view of I4.0, expressing concerns about working conditions and unemployment. Research limitations/implications The proposed framework brings interesting insights into the dispute over the meaning of I4.0. Although this empirical study was limited to companies and unions in Sweden and Spain, the framework can be expanded for broader investigations, involving additional stakeholders in one or more countries. The discussion outlined using the varieties of capitalism approach is relevant for understanding the connection between the meso and macro levels of this phenomenon. Practical implications In navigating the landscape of I4.0, managers should remain flexible, and ready to tailor their strategies and operations to align with the distinct demands and expectations of stakeholders and their specific institutional environments. Similarly, policymakers are urged to acknowledge these contextual intricacies when crafting strategies for implementing I4.0 initiatives across national settings. Social implications Based on the empirical findings, this study underscores the importance of fostering social dialogue and involving stakeholders in the implementation of I4.0. Policymakers and other stakeholders should take proactive measures, tailored to each country’s context, to mitigate potential adverse effects on labour and workers. Originality/value The study presents a novel framework that facilitates the systematic comparison of I4.0 framing by different actors. This contribution is significant because the way actors frame I4.0 affects its interpretation and implementation. Additionally, the aggregate analysis of results enables cross-country comparisons, enhancing our understanding of regional disparities.

show abstract

“…Esta nova abordagem avaliativa da interoperabilidade trata-se da junção das visões de [13] e [14] A Fig. 2 representa o fluxo processual do preenchimento da Matriz X fazendo uso dos MCDMs AHP [15], DEMATEL [16] e TOPSIS [17]. O processo contém 9 etapas onde é aplicado um determinado MCDM em cada etapa.…”

Section: Visão Geralunclassified

FRAMEWORK LIN4EIA – GERENCIAMENTO DA IMPLANTAÇÃO DO LEAN & I4.0 SOB A ÓTICA DA INTEROPERABILIDADE

Felipe Pierin Ramos,

de Freitas Rocha Loures,

Deschamps

et al. 2023

Anais Do International Conference on Production Research Americas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O processo de digitalização das pequenas e médias empresas (PMEs) brasileiras vem encontrando dificuldades que variam desde a compreensão da funcionalidade da tecnologia até o gerenciamento da implantação delas. De forma a reduzir estas barreiras, recomenda-se que se utilize os princípios básicos do Lean tanto na manufatura (Lean Manufacturing) quanto na gestão (Lean Management) em conjunto com os princípios básicos da Indústria 4.0 (I4.0), caracterizando assim o Lean & I4.0. No entanto, recomenda-se que a I4.0 atue com a Arquitetura de Interoperabilidade Organizacional (EIA) que na literatura ainda é pouco relacionada ao Lean & I4.0 sendo considerada de fundamental importância no mapeamento de barreiras. O objetivo deste artigo é desenvolver um framework onde se relacione os três conceitos (Lean, I4.0 e EIA) suportado pela metodologia Hoshin Kanri (Matriz X) para que se torne mais acessível as PMEs a gestão da implantação de novas tecnologias de forma enxuta, padronizada, e mais bem estruturada. Para tal, será utilizado os métodos multicritérios de suporte à tomada de decisão (MCDMs) para priorização de todos os elementos contidos na matriz (AHP), para análise de influência pontual entre projetos/iniciativas e entre barreiras de interoperabilidade existentes, e finalmente, para determinar o impacto entre os elementos relacionados nos quadrantes tanto da Matriz X quanto da Matriz LIN4EIA. Como resultado, tem-se a composição do framework denominado LIN4EIA apontando o roadmap de projetos a ser implantado.

show abstract

Lean in industry 4.0 is accelerating manufacturing excellence – A DEMATEL analysis

Cited by 22 publications

References 24 publications

Analysis of Digital Supply Chain Management in E-procurement Service Usage Using Decision Making Trial Method and Evaluation Laboratory in National Public Procurement Agency

Analysis of Digital Supply Chain Management in E-procurement Service Usage Using Decision Making Trial Method and Evaluation Laboratory in National Public Procurement Agency

Institutionalization and framing of Industry 4.0: a framework for understanding stakeholders and comparing countries

FRAMEWORK LIN4EIA – GERENCIAMENTO DA IMPLANTAÇÃO DO LEAN & I4.0 SOB A ÓTICA DA INTEROPERABILIDADE

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About