2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(03)00143-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lean body mass and bone mineral density in physically exercising postmenopausal women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intervention studies have shown that exercise is associated with higher bone density and lower fat mass (23,24). However, when we examined the ORs of %FM on bone outcomes, whether or not we took physical activity into account did not appreciably change the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Intervention studies have shown that exercise is associated with higher bone density and lower fat mass (23,24). However, when we examined the ORs of %FM on bone outcomes, whether or not we took physical activity into account did not appreciably change the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…6,40 However, according to Douchi et al, 7 lean mass is a more significant determinant of BMD for exercising postmenopausal women compared with sedentary women. 7 In that case, physical training composed of dynamic and resistance exercises 41 is important to prevent disability in aging and can also help to preserve muscle mass and force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in men, and preand post-menopausal women have reported that lean mass is a key determinant of BMD [3][4][5], whereas some studies of postmenopausal women have suggested that fat mass plays a key role [6,7], and both lean and fat mass have been reported to be significant predictors of BMD in other studies of men and pre-and post-menopausal women [8][9][10]. This heterogeneity in findings could arise from differences between studies in age, gender and ethnicity of participants (with associated differences in body composition), in turn reflecting the different mechanisms by which lean and fat mass influence bone mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%