Lean and BIM Interaction in a High Rise Building

Chuquín, Frank; Chuquín, Cristhian; Saire, Romina

doi:10.24928/2021/0208

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This failure in communication between team members was also noted in the cases studied by Michaud et al (2019aMichaud et al ( , 2019b and Saurin and Sanches (2014). According to Bekdik et al (2016), Chuquín et al (2021aChuquín et al ( , 2021b and Ramalingam (2018), the cause of the defect was linked to the lack of training employees, compromising the quality and performance of the process.…”

Section: Waste Found When Adopting the Value Stream Mapping And Its M...mentioning

confidence: 77%

“…It should be noted that not all the studies analyzed highlighted results or benefits from the VSM application as they did not present either of the two maps (Chuquín et al, 2021a(Chuquín et al, , 2021bEtges, 2018;Michaud et al, 2019aMichaud et al, , 2019b or presented only the construction of the current state map (Aka et al, 2017;Michaud et al, 2019aMichaud et al, , 2019bSaurin and Sanches, 2014;Vilventhan et al, 2019;Xie et al, 2018).…”

Section: Value Stream Mapping Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Value stream mapping application for construction industry loss and waste reduction: a systematic literature review

Morato,

Ferreira

2024

IJLSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The pupose of this study is to systematically review the current literature on the value stream mapping (VSM) application in the construction industry to investigate the evolution observed over time and the results obtained by adopting this tool. In addition, special attention was given to the potential of VSM in identifying loss and waste, as well as their main causes. Design/methodology/approach The study analyses papers in literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses research protocol. As a result, 383 papers were initially identified, and 47 papers were selected. Findings It was observed that the number of studies addressing this topic has been increasing over the past decade and findings related to the evolution, application and the benefits obtained from the VSM application in context of construction were presented. Additionally, the authors found that the two most cited lean wastes were waiting and defects in the production chain. The main causes of this waste and loss were also identified in this work. Practical implications This paper contributes by presenting the applicability of VSM as a tool in the construction as found in the literature. For academics, it will be possible to clearly observe research gaps and for industry managers, to identify the main sources of waste and assess the performance of the tool’s application. Originality/value The study uses a systematic review to analyze the application of the VSM tool in the construction industry and provides guidance for future research by identifying research gaps, in addition to conducting an extensive analysis of the tool’s potential in waste identification in the studied papers and their primary causes.

show abstract

Section: Waste Found When Adopting the Value Stream Mapping And Its M...mentioning

confidence: 77%

Section: Value Stream Mapping Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value stream mapping application for construction industry loss and waste reduction: a systematic literature review

Morato,

Ferreira

2024

IJLSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The third most frequent benefit is 'analysis of various design alternatives' (B3). Some characteristics of construction projects, such as unique and multidisciplinary character, complexity and uncertainty, and required financial capital make the analysis of various design options indispensable during the early stages of the projects (Chuquín et al, 2021a;Rempling et al, 2019). Therefore, benefit B3 has a positive effect on ensuring that the design solution generates the value desired by the client and satisfies the requirements that gave rise to the project.…”

Section: Benefits Of Set-based Design Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Chuquín et al (2021b) applied a survey at the end of a design process with SBD, the findings showed that 72% believed that the quality of their work had increased, and rework had decreased. Besides, Chuquín et al (2021a) conducted a survey of the usefulness of SBD among the participants of a case study of a high-rise building. The results showed that 70% of the respondents highlighted the usefulness of SBD and expressed their intention to adopt SBD in future projects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Set-Based Design in Construction Projects: Benefits, Difficulties and Trends

Castañeda¹,

Herrera²,

Sánchez³

et al. 2023

Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC31)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design processes generate inputs to plan and control the development of project construction processes. There is a growing interest in implementing design techniques involving various options to reach a systemic overview and select the best proposal. One such technique is Set-Based Design (SBD) which identifies and explores multiple design options simultaneously. Although several studies have been carried out focused on the SBD implementation in construction projects, there need to be more studies that synthesize the main findings to facilitate a proper implementation according to the different contexts. Considering this gap, this paper focuses on presenting a synthesis of SBD's benefits, difficulties, and trends in construction projects. The research method corresponds to a systematic literature review of a sample of 281 documents initially drawn from Scopus database and finally, with 32 documents screened, this study undertook the following stages. The research method has five stages: 1) scope definition; 2) searching of relevant documents; 3) document selection; 4) evidence collection, analysis, and synthesis; and 5) results report. The findings show a trend towards adopting the SBD technique for the design of structural elements of buildings and bridges. The three most frequently reported benefits of SBD adoption are: 1) transparent decision-making processes, 2) better collaboration in decision-making, and 3) better communication among designers. The three most frequently reported difficulties 1) inadequate organizational structure for the adoption of SBD, 2) lack of staff experience, 3) resistance to change in organizations.

show abstract