“…The presence of more effective and less structurally complex broad-spectrum β-lactams on the market and the lack of Gram-positive activity, along with the insufficient market potential and high production costs, were announced as the main reasons . But due to the changing landscape of the Gram-negative arena, driven largely by antibiotic resistance, this siderophore conjugate approach received renewed attention in 2010 by Basilea Pharmaceutica International, which reported the first iron-carrier antibiotic, BAL30072 (Figure ), that evolved to clinical studies. , This monobactam conjugate, with an appended dihydroxypyridinone moiety for iron chelation, exhibited in vitro bactericidal activity against P. aeruginosa , Acinetobacter species, and Enterobacteriaceae , similar to that of other monocyclic β-lactams, including against strains that produce metallo-β-lactamases. , Positive toxicity studies in rats and marmosets, along with a lack of confidence in the candidate’s success, led to the discontinuation of this candidate . Later, in 2011, a monobactam with a hydroxypyridone iron chelating group, MC-1 (Figure ), was reported by Pfizer. , This U-78608 analogue exhibited remarkable antipseudomonal activity both in vitro and in vivo . , However, MC-1 was revealed to be chemically unstable and susceptible to hydrolysis, which limited further research …”