1989
DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(89)90009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leakage through liners constructed with geomembranes—part I. Geomembrane liners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Giroud and Bonaparte (1989) recommend using a defect area of 1 cm 2 for conservative reasons and adopting a defect density of 3-5 defects per hectare, if an intensive quality control monitoring during liner construction has been done. A flaw density of 30 defects per hectare or more is recommended if quality assurance is limited to spot checks or when environmental difficulties have been encountered during installation.…”
Section: Aftercare Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giroud and Bonaparte (1989) recommend using a defect area of 1 cm 2 for conservative reasons and adopting a defect density of 3-5 defects per hectare, if an intensive quality control monitoring during liner construction has been done. A flaw density of 30 defects per hectare or more is recommended if quality assurance is limited to spot checks or when environmental difficulties have been encountered during installation.…”
Section: Aftercare Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most geomembranes have a very low permeativity to water, with most moisture transfer through the membrane occurring by diffusion rather than by bulk flow (Artieres et al 1994;Fityus and Smith 1998). The effect of a carefully laid geomembrane is to reduce moisture flow through the soil beneath the landfill to very small values (Giroud and Bonaparte 1989). If the piezometric groundwater table is located at some distance below the geomembrane and the air-entry value of the soil is not too high, then conditions are created where some depth of soil beneath the landfill will be in a state of partial saturation.…”
Section: Moisture Conditions Beneath a Landfillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Run 1, the base case against which the results of other runs were compared, it was assumed that the geomembrane liners installed at the bottom of the landfill were of poor quality, having approximately 10 flaws or defects per acre. This number was chosen on the basis of recommendations from Giraud and Bonaparte (1989) to represent a landfill where quality assurance checks were limited during installation of the liners. This assumption gives a conservative estimate of the leachate leakage rate.…”
Section: A1 Help Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Runs 2 and 3, the effect of geomembrane quality on leakage through the ,bottom of the landfill was evaluated. -According to recommendations of Giraud and Bonaparte (1989), in Run 2, a flaw density of 1 flaw/acre was evaluated to represent the geomembrane quality at an intensively monitored landfill. Decreasing the number of defects to 1 flaw/acre decreased the total leakage through the bottom of the landfill to 2.4 f?/yr/acre.…”
Section: A1 Help Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%