2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leakage Suppression for Holonomic Quantum Gates

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, TQD protocols create more opportunities to optimize parameters for achieving a better result. On the other hand, many literatures are recently focusing on the quantum optimal control for different targets, such as minimizing diabatic effects, [20] suppressing the effect of dephasing, [21][22][23] enhancing robustness against decoherence, [24][25][26][27] cutting down energy consumption, [28,29] reducing the leakage error, [30] enhancing the robustness against amplitude noise or systematic error. [31][32][33][34][35] Inspired by quantum optimal control, we inversely engineer an optimal path for quantum state transfer in a three-level system based on transitionless quantum driving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, TQD protocols create more opportunities to optimize parameters for achieving a better result. On the other hand, many literatures are recently focusing on the quantum optimal control for different targets, such as minimizing diabatic effects, [20] suppressing the effect of dephasing, [21][22][23] enhancing robustness against decoherence, [24][25][26][27] cutting down energy consumption, [28,29] reducing the leakage error, [30] enhancing the robustness against amplitude noise or systematic error. [31][32][33][34][35] Inspired by quantum optimal control, we inversely engineer an optimal path for quantum state transfer in a three-level system based on transitionless quantum driving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiqubit gates can provide versatile ways to expedite conspicuously quantum algorithms, and Rydberg atoms offer a promising quantum system for implementing multiqubit gates owing to powerful and multiple interactions among them. [37,60,61] With respect to coherent control of quantum systems interacting with external electromagnetic fields, pulse engineering (PE) based on analytic, numerical, or composite methods is of great interest, employed to make operations noise-resilient with adiabatic PE, [62][63][64] to speed up adiabatic passage, [65,66] to enhance operation immunity to control errors, [67][68][69] to suppress unwanted couplings, [70][71][72] and so on. [73][74][75][76][77][78][79] Among diverse manners, periodic PE (PPE) is of wide applications in coherent control of quantum systems for exploring plentiful quantum phenomena and completing lots of quantum tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric quantum computation (GQC) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] can work for high-fidelity quantum gates by utilizing the geometric characteristics to resist operational imperfection. The early proposals of GQC, based on adiabatic Abelian [33] or adiabatic non-Abelian geometric phases, [34][35][36][37] always suffer from the detrimental influence of decoherence due to slow operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%