2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-017-0703-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf trait plasticity in six forest tree species of central Amazonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Asat and gsCO2 were measured at 1000 μmol m -2 s -1 , ambient temperature (27 °C), relative humidity of 70 ± 5%, and CO2 concentration of 400 ppm (ambient CO2 treatment) and 700 ppm (eCO2 treatment). We also determined light and CO2-saturated photosynthesis (Amax) at a [CO2] of 2000 ppm (Ca), as previously described (Marenco et al 2017). To obtain Asat-mass, Amax-mass, CEmass and gsCO2-mass, photosynthetic rates, CE and gsCO2 per unit area were converted to a mass basis by multiplying them by SLA.…”
Section: Gas Exchange Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asat and gsCO2 were measured at 1000 μmol m -2 s -1 , ambient temperature (27 °C), relative humidity of 70 ± 5%, and CO2 concentration of 400 ppm (ambient CO2 treatment) and 700 ppm (eCO2 treatment). We also determined light and CO2-saturated photosynthesis (Amax) at a [CO2] of 2000 ppm (Ca), as previously described (Marenco et al 2017). To obtain Asat-mass, Amax-mass, CEmass and gsCO2-mass, photosynthetic rates, CE and gsCO2 per unit area were converted to a mass basis by multiplying them by SLA.…”
Section: Gas Exchange Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…番茄中, 根据茸毛是否含有或分泌对昆虫 或病原体具有抗性的化合物, 将多细胞茸毛分为ⅠV [49] , 并且随着叶片个体差异 而有所变化 [50] , 而茸毛长度增加会导致叶片对光的 吸收率下降. 致密的茸毛能够调节叶片的热量平衡, 并且拦截光量子, 从而影响植物体的气体交换, 在高 光强时具有保护作用 [51] . 有研究表明, 叶片茸毛的 密度是可变的, 并且受遗传和环境因素决定 [1] , 当土 壤水分不足, 高温, 蒸气压亏缺(vapour pressure deficit, VPD)时能增加叶片茸毛密度 [52,53] .…”
Section: 和非腺毛结构 有研究表明 很多已经被定位和克隆unclassified
“…It has been frequently assumed that within-species variation is smaller than among species. This is exemplified by the large number of studies based on species means (e.g., Liu et al, 2021;Kelly et al, 2021) regardless of both theoretical background (Bolnick et al, 2011;Violle et al, 2012) and empirical evidence for intraspecific variation (e.g., Albert et al, 2011;Marenco et al, 2017;Osnas et al, 2018;Dong et al, 2020), pointing out that we still know little at which scales, life-forms, taxa and across which environmental gradients intraspecific variation is relevant to ecological processes. Moreover, there is a virtual lack of information on these patterns of intra to interspecific trait variation in palms, which have been suggested to be particularly susceptible to droughts (Eiserhardt et al, 2011;Esquivel-Muelbert et al, 2019; but see Emilio et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%