1971
DOI: 10.1104/pp.47.4.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Temperature Effects on Measurements of Diffusive Resistance to Water Vapor Transfer

Abstract: ABSTRACTis low (ri = 1-2 sec cml). When Tleaf-Tup = 5 C, the ratio drops below 0.5. Under high leaf resistance conditions (rz = 10-50 sec cm-') the comparable ratios are approximately 0.9 and 0.7, respectively. sensor which is sensitive over a narrow range of relative humidity at the low end of the relative humidity range. In operation, the cup is dried by air from a silica gel dehydrator. It is then placed over the leaf. Transpiration proceeds, the humidity in the cup increases, and the time required for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1992). Nevertheless, there are many sources of error in all such techniques involving gas exchange, and error in the measurement of leaf temperature is still probably the most common and significant (Morrow & Slatyer 1971; Mott & Peak 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1992). Nevertheless, there are many sources of error in all such techniques involving gas exchange, and error in the measurement of leaf temperature is still probably the most common and significant (Morrow & Slatyer 1971; Mott & Peak 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the drying cycle, and following re-irrigation, leaf water potential, conductance, and photosynthesis were measured on three or four randomly selected plants in each treatment at 3 h intervals each day during the light period. Adaxial leaf conductance to water vapour (gj cm~^ s~^) was measured with an unventilated diffusion' porometer sensor (LI-COR model 205) connected to an autoporometer(LI-CORmodel65, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) using procedures outlined by Kanemasu, Thurtell & Tanner (1969) and observing precautions of Morrow & Slatyer (1971). Photosynthesis measurements were completed using instruments and techniques of Michaels et al (1985).…”
Section: Plant and Environmental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaxial leaf conductance to water vapour (gj cm~^ s~^) was measured with an unventilated diffusion' porometer sensor (LI-COR model 205) connected to an autoporometer(LI-CORmodel65, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) using procedures outlined by Kanemasu, Thurtell & Tanner (1969) and observing precautions of Morrow & Slatyer (1971). Photosynthesis measurements were completed using instruments and techniques of Michaels et al (1985).…”
Section: Plant and Environmental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5 shows, that not only the accuracy of the leaf temperature measurement is of importance for the determination of the water vapour diffusion resistance (Morrow and Slatyer, 1971;Slatyer, 1971), but the accuracy of the absolute humidity measurement and transpiration rate determination is even more significant.…”
Section: D) Errors O/transpiration Measurement and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little attention has been directed to the additional errors of digital data recording systems as well as the errors resulting from subsequent calculations (Eckardt, 1966;Cernusca and Moser, 1969;Kiese and Surkow, 1971) despite the recognized importance of overall errors in the interpretation of the results (Morrow and Slatyer, 1971;Slatyer, ~971;Tranquillini and Caldwell, 1972). We will therefore describe the ~ eration of a digital data handling system used in conjunction with gemperature-and humidity-controlled plant cuvettes for C02 exchange and transpiration measurements (Lange et al, 1969;Koch et al, 1971).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%