2014
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1043.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Morphology of the Sweet Chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) ¿ a Methodological Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest coefficient of variation was observed for the surface (S) in the Azla watershed which consists of coppice and natural populations. This same observation was made for Croatian ecotypes [13]. In contrast, the least variable parameter was the shape ratio LL/LW, which is explained by the stability of the shape ratios [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The highest coefficient of variation was observed for the surface (S) in the Azla watershed which consists of coppice and natural populations. This same observation was made for Croatian ecotypes [13]. In contrast, the least variable parameter was the shape ratio LL/LW, which is explained by the stability of the shape ratios [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Leaf variability is greatly influenced by various microclimate factors, their position on the shoot and tree, and the type of shoot on which they develop [50,[55][56][57]. In this study, those sources of variability were attempted to be reduced by collecting all leaves from the external sunlit part of the tree crown from short fertile shoots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These signs reflect the degree of plant resistance, because the leaves are the most important organs of photosynthesis and transpiration (Sahin and Soylu, 1991;Bruschi et al, 2003;Pinto et al, 2011;Mensah, 2012). These characteristics are important for genotypes identification base on the observation of morphological characteristics of which expressions are largely influenced by developmental, environmental and cultivation factors (Serdar and Kurt, 2011;Poljak et al, 2014). Many authors use morphological analyses to estimate the variability of Castanea sativa and which confirm that the leaf parameters can be appropriate variables for establishing the level of genotype variability (Aravanopoulos et al, 2001;Aravanopoulos, 2005;Bolvansky and Uzik, 2005;Álvarez-Álvarez et al, 2006;Ertan, 2007;Zarafshar et al, 2010;Serdar and Kurt, 2011;Mujagić-Pašić and Ballian, 2012;Poljak et al, 2014;Atefe et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%