2002
DOI: 10.1199/tab.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Development

Abstract: Many mutants of Arabidopsis were isolated with alterations in leaf morphology thirty and forty years ago (e.g., Rédei, 1962; Lee-Chen and Steinitz-Sears, 1967; Barabas and Rédei, 1971), but each mutation was used merely as a positional marker for genetic mapping (e.g., Koornneef et al., 1983). The associated phenotypes were not analyzed initially in terms of developmental genetics, except in a few cases (Rüffer-Turner and Napp-Zinn, 1979). Early anatomical analyses of leaf development were reported for several… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the auxin-resistant1 ( axr1 ) mutant has obviously smaller leaves, inflorescence stems, and floral organs, and anatomic examination shows that the reduced size of its leaf and stem is caused by a decrease in cell number rather than cell size (Lincoln et al, 1990). Although these observations suggest that AXR1 might be involved in auxin-dependent cell proliferation during development (Tsukaya, 2002), there is no molecular data to support this claim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the auxin-resistant1 ( axr1 ) mutant has obviously smaller leaves, inflorescence stems, and floral organs, and anatomic examination shows that the reduced size of its leaf and stem is caused by a decrease in cell number rather than cell size (Lincoln et al, 1990). Although these observations suggest that AXR1 might be involved in auxin-dependent cell proliferation during development (Tsukaya, 2002), there is no molecular data to support this claim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of considerable efforts to reveal the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying cell fate determination in leaves, our understanding is still largely limited (Tsukaya, 2002a;Tsukaya, 2002b;Tsukaya, 2002c). In this report, we describe the bop1-1 mutation that induces abnormal expression of class I knox genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Possibly, the presence of cotyledons is required during embryogenesis to define and organise the SAM properly (Torres Ruiz, 2004). This would be reminiscent of postembryonic development where genes expressed in the adaxial and abaxial sides of leaves are thought to influence SAM development (Siegfried et al, 1999;Sawa et al, 1999;McConnell et al, 2001;Kerstetter et al, 2001;Kumaran et al, 2002;Tsukaya, 2002). Double mutant combinations of cuc1, cuc2 and cuc3 genes, which develop one fused cotyledon and no SAM, suggested a requirement of bilateral symmetry and cotyledon boundaries for SAM formation (Aida et al, 1997;Aida et al, 1999;Vroemen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Mutations In Enhancer Of Pinoid and Pinoid Cause The Laternementioning
confidence: 99%