1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00345526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf-conditioning by microorganisms

Abstract: Many detritus-feeders prefer dead leaves which are colonized by microorganisms-i.e. conditioned leaves, over freshly fallen or sterile leaves. Traditionally, this has been attributed to the build-up of microbial cells on the substrate. Two experiments show that changes in the leaf itself, brought about by microbial excretions and secretions, or by a hydrolytic agent (hot HCl), can also increase its palatability to the detritus-feeding amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fungal and bacterial cues, therefore, may be more specific cues for decaying leaves than algal cues, since algae also grow on mineral substrates and then do not contribute to leaf decomposition. Our findings are consistent with other observations that all showed a preference of Gammarus to fungi-conditioned leaves (Ba¨rlocher & Kendrick, 1975;Sutcliffe et al, 1981;Grac¸a et al, 1993a). This preference is explained from the presence of aquatic hyphomycetes that degrade the pectic polymers in leaf cell walls (Chamier & Dixon, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Fungal and bacterial cues, therefore, may be more specific cues for decaying leaves than algal cues, since algae also grow on mineral substrates and then do not contribute to leaf decomposition. Our findings are consistent with other observations that all showed a preference of Gammarus to fungi-conditioned leaves (Ba¨rlocher & Kendrick, 1975;Sutcliffe et al, 1981;Grac¸a et al, 1993a). This preference is explained from the presence of aquatic hyphomycetes that degrade the pectic polymers in leaf cell walls (Chamier & Dixon, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Shredder feeding rates are indirectly influenced by the activity and diversity of microbial decomposers that enhance leaf palatability and can also modulate leaf consumption by shredders through selective feeding on particular hyphomycete taxa (Bärlocher and Kendrick, 1975, Arsuffi and Suberkropp, 1989. Consequently, any modification in the structure and function of leaf-associated microbial communities can potentially alter the transfer of matter and energy to the upper trophic levels in detrital foodwebs .…”
Section: Drought and Tbz Stress Effects Along The Aquatic Detrital Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbes, aquatic hyphomycetes in particular, macerate the leaf matrix by the activities of extracellular enzymes (Chamier and Dixon 1982), convert organic carbon into fungal biomass (mycelium and conidia; Gessner and Chauvet 1994;Gulis and Suberkropp 2003;Ferreira et al 2012), and mineralize it (Gulis and Suberkropp 2003), which leads to litter mass loss (Hieber and Gessner 2002). The accumulation of fungal biomass and the maceration of litter increase the litter quality for invertebrate detritivores, whose feeding activities lead to further litter mass loss (Bärlocher and Kendrick 1975;Graça et al 2001;Chung and Suberkropp 2009). Therefore, any changes in microbial colonization and conditioning of submerged leaf litter can be carried over to higher trophic levels, with effects on litter decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%