2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00330.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf area index is the principal scaling parameter for both gross photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration of Northern deciduous and coniferous forests

Abstract: Data on net CO2 exchange from eight forests in Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland were used to analyse which factors were controlling photosynthesis and respiration. The forests consisted of different species ranging in climatic condition from temperate to subarctic. Only well mixed conditions were analysed (u* > 0.3 m s−1). The parameters of a light response function showed strong seasonal variations with similar behaviour for all stands except for a beech forest where the development of a vigorous ground v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APAR is chosen instead of S 0 as used in the Jarvis et al (2004) study for better comparability with other studies and because of the overwhelming evidences for the significance of the leaf area index or FPAR as scaling-factor for soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer processes (Watson, 1958;Monteith, 1977;Tucker and Sellers, 1986;Goetz and Prince, 1999;Gower et al, 1999;Lindroth et al, 2008), an explanatory power and intrinsic scaling factor which cannot be compensated by other environmental variables used in the light use efficiency model approach. The model performance varies between the water availability surrogates at the study sites, but none of them delivers the best results in every case.…”
Section: Finding New Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APAR is chosen instead of S 0 as used in the Jarvis et al (2004) study for better comparability with other studies and because of the overwhelming evidences for the significance of the leaf area index or FPAR as scaling-factor for soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer processes (Watson, 1958;Monteith, 1977;Tucker and Sellers, 1986;Goetz and Prince, 1999;Gower et al, 1999;Lindroth et al, 2008), an explanatory power and intrinsic scaling factor which cannot be compensated by other environmental variables used in the light use efficiency model approach. The model performance varies between the water availability surrogates at the study sites, but none of them delivers the best results in every case.…”
Section: Finding New Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their mutual relationship is considered to be relatively constant -1.68 to 2.0 at 25 • C (Medlyn et al, 2002b;Leuning, 2002), even though the magnitudes of the parameters may vary considerably, this was considered important. Also, in the Eq.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Modelled Fluxes To Changes In Lai and Biochemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, the biochemical model parameters are considered to have a relatively constant ratio to each other, the relation J max /V c(max) usually being around 1.68 to 2.0 (Medlyn et al, 2002b;Leuning 2002) at 25 • C. Since the Roberntz and Stockfors (1998) temperature dependencies of J max and V c(max) are dissimilar this ratio is dependent on temperature: at 20 • C their ratio has been estimated to be 2.68 (Leuning, 1997). In our measurements the relationship between the two biochemical parameters was not as represented in the literature: J max had larger values at higher temperatures.…”
Section: The Magnitude Of the Biochemical Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Rh and ER decline due to a reduction in litterfall and substrate availability through decomposition. The resulting imbalance between GPP and ER persists until vegetation and soil C pools increase up to the point when ER comes into equilibrium with GPP (Schwarz et al 2004, Lindroth et al 2008, Luyssaert et al 2008, Tang et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%