2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf area index estimation using top-of-canopy airborne RGB images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, AquaCrop uses canopy cover to determine the amount of water transpired that later reflected on crop yield through its relation with biomass simulation (Steduto et al, 2009). Accuracy of canopy cover estimates using digital image analysis limited by angle of view during aerial image capturing and canopy closure at later stage of crop growth resulting in saturation signal (Fiala et al, 2006;Raj et al, 2021). On the contrary, LAI estimates using a direct method as done in this study gives the most accurate values (Raj et al, 2021).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, AquaCrop uses canopy cover to determine the amount of water transpired that later reflected on crop yield through its relation with biomass simulation (Steduto et al, 2009). Accuracy of canopy cover estimates using digital image analysis limited by angle of view during aerial image capturing and canopy closure at later stage of crop growth resulting in saturation signal (Fiala et al, 2006;Raj et al, 2021). On the contrary, LAI estimates using a direct method as done in this study gives the most accurate values (Raj et al, 2021).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Accuracy of canopy cover estimates using digital image analysis limited by angle of view during aerial image capturing and canopy closure at later stage of crop growth resulting in saturation signal (Fiala et al, 2006;Raj et al, 2021). On the contrary, LAI estimates using a direct method as done in this study gives the most accurate values (Raj et al, 2021). Hence, using LAI by DSSAT and canopy cover by AquaCrop as primary engine for capturing resources during the formation of biomass and subsequent yield might be additional reasons for variation in the accuracy of yield estimation between the two The Journal of Agricultural Science 9 models.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the head emergence stage of winter wheat, wheat spikes grow out and the canopies become more and more dense, literature shows that leaf biochemical variables based on remote sensing technique perform well in the early stage, however, it tends to produce uncertainty or error during the reproductive stage [48], and then could result in more difficulties to monitor their vertical profile within canopies. Thus, it is vital to fully understand the effects of spikes on canopy reflectance and the detection degree of leaf information in different vertical layers by remotely sensed data, then to derive spectral indices to estimate vertical leaf biochemical parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating LAI with the help of remote sensing systems has been a key objective in precision agriculture [206]. The most common method for the estimation of LAI is the fusion of empirical relationships between vegetation indices (Vis) and LAI data (Table 1) [207][208][209][210][211][212]. The fusion of empirical models has been widely adopted for LAI monitoring; however, these models do not show efficient results in all environmental conditions, as their parameters are limited to particular regions [213][214][215].…”
Section: Laimentioning
confidence: 99%