2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.20200018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf area estimation with nondestructive method in cassava

Abstract: The objective of this study was to create a single mathematical equation able to estimate the leaf area of different cassava cultivars from one lineal dimension without destroying any plant tissue. Two hundred leaves per cultivar from ten cultivars were used to calibrate the model and more than one hundred leaves per cultivar were used to test its predictive capacity as independent data. All equations were the result of the nonlinear correlation between the leaf area and the length of its central lobe. To vali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models showed the highest coefficients of determination (R²) (0.9991 and 0.9954), Pearson's linear correlation coefficients (r) (0.9977 and 0.9976), and Willmott agreement indexes (d) (0.9988 and 0.9988) and the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) (560.75 and 567.08) and root mean square error values (RMSE) (0.7998 and 0.8108) (Table 1). Linear and power models were also the most suitable for estimating the LA of other plant species (Tondjo et al, 2015;Trachta et al, 2020;Montelatto et al, 2021;Mela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models showed the highest coefficients of determination (R²) (0.9991 and 0.9954), Pearson's linear correlation coefficients (r) (0.9977 and 0.9976), and Willmott agreement indexes (d) (0.9988 and 0.9988) and the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) (560.75 and 567.08) and root mean square error values (RMSE) (0.7998 and 0.8108) (Table 1). Linear and power models were also the most suitable for estimating the LA of other plant species (Tondjo et al, 2015;Trachta et al, 2020;Montelatto et al, 2021;Mela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to estimate the LA of the cultivars individually and in general. This model was also the most suitable for estimating the leaf area of other plant species (Trachta et al 2020, Toebe et al 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cultivars have similar leaf shape, a single model is used to estimate leaf area (Cristofori et al 2008;Mendoza-de Gyves et al 2008;Rouphael et al 2010). On the other hand, when there are differences in leaf morphology among cultivars, the use of a single model is an oversimplification and not recommended (Trachta et al 2020). Non-destructive models are good alternatives to leaf area meters as these devices are expensive and most of them do not fit small guava leaves, causing leaf injuries and estimation errors.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%