2008
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Area Estimation Model for Small Fruits from Linear Measurements

Abstract: Accurate and nondestructive methods to determine individual leaf areas of plants are a useful tool in physiological and agronomic research. Determining the individual leaf area (LA) of small fruit like raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.), redcurrant (Ribes rubrum L.), blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L.), gooseberry (Ribes grossularia L.), and highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3) based on the product of L × W, that was able to provide accurate predictions of the single LA both for all the three species and for each cultivar during the calibration and validation phases. This result is consistent also with previous studies on LA estimation in several fruits and horticultural crops ( [18,36,[47][48][49]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3) based on the product of L × W, that was able to provide accurate predictions of the single LA both for all the three species and for each cultivar during the calibration and validation phases. This result is consistent also with previous studies on LA estimation in several fruits and horticultural crops ( [18,36,[47][48][49]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this respect, there is an increasing interest in using computer-assisted imaging systems [8] for producing reliable biometric measurements [9] and analyzing phenotypic traits related to plant architecture and leaf characteristics [10]. For instance, data on leaf characteristics can be incorporated into databases [11,12] and employed to validate time-series quantification of leaf morphology (e.g., [13,14]) and to determine the performance of computer-assisted imaging systems and machine learning algorithms used to classify/recognize phenotypic traits of specific genotypes [15].Leaf area is generally measured with destructive or non-destructive methods [16], the latter often preferred as they are faster, cheaper, and non-invasive (i.e., no excision of leaves is required), therefore, permitting repeated and simultaneous measurements of LA and other physiological parameters (e.g., leaf gas exchange or fluorescence) on the same leaves.Collected information, such as leaf blade length (L) and width (W) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] or the shape ratio of the leaf (L:W) [26], can be useful for characterizing leaf functions and structure, based only on proxy variables. In particular, the leaf shape ratio is of particular importance in horticultural sciences as it is regulated by several genetic factors and mutations [27], whose diversity can be analyzed in functional [28] and evolutionary terms [29].Thus far, numerous models have been proposed and applied with respect to both leaf (e.g., [20,30,31]) and shoot level [31-41] morphology of several fruit, vegetable, ornamental, medicinal, and aromatic crops [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leaf area was estimated weekly during the experiments by measuring the length and width of every leaf on the plants using a standard 30-cm-length ruler. Each measurement was converted to leaf area using linear model developed for highbush blueberry (Follovo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the VIF values higher than 10 or TV values smaller than 0.10, then collinearity may have more than a trivial impact on the estimates of the parameters and consequently one of them should be excluded from the model (Cristofori et al 2007, Fallovo et al 2008, Rouphael et al 2010. The models proposed by Wiersma and Bailey (1975) were evaluated for their accuracy in LA prediction in the present study: LE = 0.624 + 0.723 LW T = 0.411 + 2.008 LW TLA = 6.532 + 2.045 ΣLW (summed product of L and W of terminal leaflets per plant).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%