1984
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.109.6.861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Area Development Patterns in Young Pruned and Unpruned Apple Trees

Abstract: Six-year-old ‘Empire’/Malling 7 (M7) apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees were left unpruned or pruned moderately during dormancy, and early-season leaf area development patterns were examined. Pruning markedly shifted leaf area distribution from spur to extension shoot. Leaf area at and shortly after bloom nearly doubled in the unpruned trees due to the increased percentage of the leaf area in rapidly developing spurs; however, the final total leaf areas were not affected significantly by the pruning. Leaf ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that because shoot growth decreased, the sink demand for shoot leaf carbohydrates also decreased, increasing carbohydrates concentration in leaves. Reduced area of fruiting spurs leaves caused by paclobutrazol treatment may have been responsible for the decrease in apple size (6), or treatment may have slowed spur leaf development which can also affect fruit yield (11). However, it is also possible that GA biosynthesis inhibition may have been responsible for the slight reduction in apple size rather than competition for carbohydrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that because shoot growth decreased, the sink demand for shoot leaf carbohydrates also decreased, increasing carbohydrates concentration in leaves. Reduced area of fruiting spurs leaves caused by paclobutrazol treatment may have been responsible for the decrease in apple size (6), or treatment may have slowed spur leaf development which can also affect fruit yield (11). However, it is also possible that GA biosynthesis inhibition may have been responsible for the slight reduction in apple size rather than competition for carbohydrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent model of vine growth and development (10,20), along with a preceding paper (21), demonstrates that vine dry matter production may be predicted by several methods. If the dynamics of N uptake and partitioning within the vine are known, it may be possible to predict the amount of N required for vines in a particular vineyard.…”
Section: Literature Citedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The increase in area and dry weight per shoot at lower shoot densities was due to an increase in the contribution of lateral shoots to each growth parameter. Lakso (20) found that pruning stimulated the production of laterals from 1year-old shoots such that pruning had no significant effect on total leaf area at full canopy of young apple trees. May et al (24) found that increasing the number of nodes per vine (by altering the pruning pattern) did not increase pruning weights to a similiar extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying apple trees, Hansen (1977) and Lakso (1984) showed that short twig leaves, representing foliarized structures (Lauri and Te Ârouanne, 1991;Lauri and Kelner, 2001), start to export carbohydrates 10 d after the onset of growth, whereas rather axialized long shoots (Lauri and Te Ârouanne, 1991;Lauri and Kelner, 2001) do not export carbohydrates until 3±4 weeks after budding. In agreement with Hansen's (1977) results, Lakso (1984), Johnson and Lakso (1986), Lakso and Corelli-Grappelli (1992) and Lauri and Kelner (2001) showed that, contrary to long shoots, the capacity of short shoots to precociously export carbohydrates to other parts of the plant could be linked, in part, to the development of a reduced quantity of caulinary tissues by these structures (Johnson and Lakso, 1986). Thereafter, less time is required to complete stem structure formation after lengthening of leafy shoots.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Rubus Alceifolius Behaviour Through Axiali...mentioning
confidence: 99%