1981
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600040971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Area as a Factor in Disease Assessment

Abstract: Recently it has become evident that the estimates of crop losses by biotic and abiotic agents are not adequate for present-day requirements. With the increasing awareness of the need for more accurate and reliable crop loss estimates within both administrative and scientific disciplines, there has been an enhanced interest in the precision of disease measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The arithmetic mean of disease severity, estimated from different leaves at different positions on the main stem may either underestimate or overestimate the actual disease severity. For example, early epidemics may have secondary effects on the subsequent leaf area which may be larger than the direct effects of disease itself at the later stage (Lim & Gaunt 1981). Disease measurements on a percentage basis do not indicate the loss of healthy foliage, their subsequent ability to capture solar radiation or the effects of this loss later in the crop growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arithmetic mean of disease severity, estimated from different leaves at different positions on the main stem may either underestimate or overestimate the actual disease severity. For example, early epidemics may have secondary effects on the subsequent leaf area which may be larger than the direct effects of disease itself at the later stage (Lim & Gaunt 1981). Disease measurements on a percentage basis do not indicate the loss of healthy foliage, their subsequent ability to capture solar radiation or the effects of this loss later in the crop growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, damage by mildew cannot be attributed to the radiation use efficiency only, as this effect is confounded with the interception of radiation during the season. A consequence of this effect is that if crop growth is analysed in relation to the cumulative amount of radiation intercepted Berger, 1987 andLim andGaunt, 1981), effects of diseases like mildew appear absent as small differences between the slopes of the relations are then hard to detect. To complete these analysis, the relation between the disease intensity and the total amount of radiation intercepted should be included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A estimativa da produção por meio da duração da área fotossinteticamente ativa expressa uma relação com base fisiológica definida, por dar maior ênfase às características do hospedeiro (Lim & Gaunt, 1981), portanto, é menos empírica que a obtida com uso da severidade.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified