1961
DOI: 10.1086/336125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Abscission in Cotton. IV. Effects of a Natural Promoter and Amino Acids on Abscission in Cotyledonary Node Explants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hall et al (5) reported that amino acids were poor promoters of abscission, but their tests did not include those amino acids which we have found to show greatest activity in the bean abscission test. Moreover, these workers tested the amino acids by incorporating them into lanolin and applying this to the cut ends of cotton cotyledon petioles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hall et al (5) reported that amino acids were poor promoters of abscission, but their tests did not include those amino acids which we have found to show greatest activity in the bean abscission test. Moreover, these workers tested the amino acids by incorporating them into lanolin and applying this to the cut ends of cotton cotyledon petioles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Osborne (7) reported that besides auxins, diffusates from senescing leaves of various species were able to accelerate abscission of bean explants, while green leaf diffusates showed smaller effects. Since then, other workers (3,5) 2,000 ft-c, and a temperature of 24 ± 2 C. Approximately 13 days from seeding, the primary leaves were excised and the blades trimmed off. The petiole pieces were then cut by a 1 cm cutter so that the abscission zone was in the center of the explant with the pulvinus and about 1 mm of the midrib tissue on the distal side of the abscission zone and 5 mm of the petiole on the proximal side.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biofilms were quantified after adding 200 µL of 95% ethanol, followed by slight manual shaking. The absorbance was measured at 585 nm wavelength (λ), as reported in previous studies [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Pcp and Surfactant Effects On Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%