2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadless Pacing—Uncertainties Remain About Safety and Efficacy

Abstract: patients: an analysis of safety and efficacy. Cardiovasc Interv Ther.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of electronic pacemakers had improved the quality of life for many patients with SSS, but it still has problems with infection, post-cardiac injury syndrome, wire loss and limited electronic life ( 60 ). In addition, many patients were not suitable or unwilling to undergo permanent pacemaker implantation ( 61 ). These problems limited the electronic pacemaker as the most ideal treatment for SSS, and scientists began to look for a more ideal treatment, therefore, the biological pacemaker was born on demand under such a background ( 62 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of electronic pacemakers had improved the quality of life for many patients with SSS, but it still has problems with infection, post-cardiac injury syndrome, wire loss and limited electronic life ( 60 ). In addition, many patients were not suitable or unwilling to undergo permanent pacemaker implantation ( 61 ). These problems limited the electronic pacemaker as the most ideal treatment for SSS, and scientists began to look for a more ideal treatment, therefore, the biological pacemaker was born on demand under such a background ( 62 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%