Leading through the first wave of COVID: a Canadian action research study

Abstract

Purpose This first phase of a three-phase action research project aims to define leadership practices that should be used during and after the pandemic to re-imagine and rebuild the health and social care system. Specifically, the objectives were to determine what effective leadership practices Canadian health leaders have used through the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, to explore how these differ from pre-crisis practices; and to identify what leadership practices might be leveraged to create the desired health and care systems of the future. Design/methodology/approach The authors used an action research methodology. In the first phase, reported here, the authors conducted one-on-one, virtual interviews with 18 health leaders from across Canada and across leadership roles. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. Findings Five key practices emerged from the data, within the core dimension of disrupting entrenched structures and leadership practices. These were, namely, responding to more complex emotions in self and others. Future practice identified to create more psychologically supportive workplaces. Agile and adaptive leadership. Future practice should allow leaders to move systemic change forward more quickly. Integrating diverse perspectives, within and across organizations, leveling hierarchies through bringing together a variety of perspectives in the decision-making process and engaging people more broadly in the co-creation of strategies. Applying existing leadership capabilities and experience. Future practice should develop and expand mentorship to support early career leadership. Communication was increased to build credibility and trust in response to changing and often contradictory emerging evidence and messaging. Future practice should increase communication. Research limitations/implications The project was limited to health leaders in Canada and did not represent all provinces/territories. Participants were recruited through the leadership networks, while diverse, were not demographically representative. All interviews were conducted in English; in the second phase of the study, the authors will recruit a larger and more diverse sample and conduct interviews in both English and French. As the interviews took place during the early stages of the pandemic, it may be that health leaders’ views of what may be required to re-define future health systems may change as the crisis shifts over time. Practical implications The sponsoring organization of this research – the Canadian Health Leadership Network and each of its individual member partners – will mobilize knowledge from this research, and subsequent phases, to inform processes for leadership development and, succession planning across, the Canadian health system, particularly those attributes unique to a context of crisis management but also necessary in post-crisis recovery. Social implications This research has shown that there is an immediate need to develop innovative and influential leadership action – commensurate with its findings – to supporting the evolution of the Canadian health system, the emotional well-being of the health-care workforce, the mental health of the population and challenges inherent in structural inequities across health and health care that discriminate against certain populations. Originality/value An interdisciplinary group of health researchers and decision-makers from across Canada who came together rapidly to examine leadership practices during COVID-19’s first wave using action research study design.

Failure of crisis leadership in a global pandemic: some reflections on COVID-19 and future recommendations

“…Unsurprisingly, the results also varied across societies. But, despite prior claims that sound leadership is fundamental to managing any public health crisis at the preparedness, planning, response and recovery stages, evidence shows that effective crisis leadership was in short supply at the heart of the pandemic when it should have mattered most (Grint, 2020; The Guardian, 2020; Hartney et al , 2022; Balasubramanian and Fernandes, 2022).…”

“…Reflecting on specific phases across the timeline of the pandemic, pointers continue to emerge as to what good and bad leadership actually entail in practice, both at political and institutional levels. Whilst some world leaders have been praised for exhibiting inspirational leadership in response to the pandemic, others have been heavily criticised for their handling of the crisis Chater (2020), Hartney et al (2022). The aim of this paper, therefore, is to reflect on key lessons that emerged from the management and governance of the COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of crisis leadership.…”

Leaders supporting leaders: Leaders’ role in building resilience and psychologically healthy workplaces during the pandemic and beyond

“…This paper is a summary, as of December 2021, of a subsidiary project undertaken by CHLNet as a response to the first phase of its “Leading Through COVID” (LTC-19) action research study. 15 A major challenge for leaders identified in the first phase was the need for personal and organizational resilience, while supporting workers in their psychological health and safety.…”

The pathway from mental health, leaves of absence, and return to work of health professionals: Gender and leadership matter

“…Some researchers have proposed or reviewed leadership models and frameworks that could be effective in different contexts (including healthcare) during the pandemic. [53][54][55][56][57] For instance, the LEADS leadership capabilities framework identifies the characteristics of good leaders (ie, lead self, engage others, achieve results, develop coalitions, and champion system transformation) but may require adaptation to context. 58…”