Leading in an Amish Paradise: humanistic leadership in the Old Order Amish

Abstract

PurposeThe authors examined the traditional leadership practiced by the Old Order Amish located in the Holmes and Wayne counties of America. Despite popular stereotypes, this community is remarkably innovative and resilient. Amish leadership aligns with the central tenets of humanistic leadership and provides a rich illustration of how such a leadership paradigm can foster a vibrant, inclusive and sustainable community. Unlike current leadership models that focus on instrumental values like wealth, profit and growth, Amish leadership is concerned with faith, community and living a simple life with purpose and dignity.Design/methodology/approachThe primary data required for this paper were collected by the lead author during a six-month ethnographic study on several Amish communities located in Ohio. The authors also consulted a large set of archival data, including think tank reports, census data, biographies, magazine features and academic publications, which helped in placing the primary data in perspective and reminding of the particularities of the contexts from which the primary data were collected. For the data analysis, the authors used a thematic analysis approach to allow the salient themes of Amish humanistic leadership emerge from the data.FindingsA total offour themes emerged from this study: (1) leadership as local identity and practice; (2) leaders without benefits, chosen by the lot; (3) leaders present matters, followers discuss and decide; (4) community welfare as the yardstick for evaluation. These themes highlighted some of the key aspects of humanistic leadership eclipsed in the mainstream theories of management and leadership. They showed how the Amish respond to the encroachment of technology, which holds critical clues for how humanistic leaders can place the needs of their people before the demands of their shareholders. By examining Amish leadership in detail, this study demonstrated the potential of humanistic leadership for creating a strong and sustainable community while also contributing to the empirical foundation of humanistic management.Originality/valueGiven the closed nature of the Amish, only few academic studies exist, which examined their leadership style. Furthermore, the traditional and conservative nature of the Amish community has prevented critics from investigating their leadership as a model for revitalizing other communities.

Opening Constructive Dialogues Between Business Ethics Research and the Sociology of Morality: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium

“…These streams of sociological research can inform and be informed by the parallel works that have been ongoing in business ethics and organizational research. The literature of cross-cultural business ethics, for instance, has identified and partly explained the variation of moral categories across different cultures (Husted and Allen 2008 ; Keim and Shadnam 2020 ; Robertson and Crittenden 2003 ). Organization research streams of institutional theory (Haveman and Rao 1997 ; Thornton 2002 ) and sensemaking (Reinecke and Ansari 2005 ; Sonenshein 2006 , 2007 , 2009 ) have also documented shifts of moral boundaries in various organizational settings.…”

Balancing Breadth and Depth in Qualitative Research: Conceptualizing performativity through multi-sited ethnography

“…Multi-sited ethnography is the practice of conducting ethnographic research through following the phenomenon of interest in multiple sites, in different times and locations (Marcus, 1995). While MOS researchers have employed multi-sited ethnography for a variety of research purposes (e.g., Akemu & Abdelnour, 2020; Keim & Shadnam, 2020; Prasad, Prasad, & Mir, 2011; Rauf, Prasad, & Razzaque, 2018; Van Maanen, 2010), it has rarely been employed in empirical work on performativity. This is due to a deep-seated tension between ethnography and performativity.…”

Problematic presuppositions in corporate philanthropy research: Reflexivity and reframing

“…Accordingly, it is noted that in China, for instance, the government has been the sole provider of public goods and social services for decades, and thus corporate philanthropy is still considered an alien concept that has been recently transposed by people who returned to China after studying or working abroad (Luo et al, 2021). Underlying the majority of studies in this body of work is the flawed treatment of a country’s culture as monolithic, which goes counter to abundance of evidence provided by more nuanced, ethnographic studies (Keim and Shadnam, 2020; Sackmann and Phillips, 2004). So further research would be needed to explain why the presupposition of amoral instrumentality has started to emerge more vividly in the work of researchers from certain cultural backgrounds.…”