2012
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading change: Applying change management approaches to engage students in blended learning

Abstract: (UniSA) have embarked on Federally-funded project to collaborate in the design, development and delivery of a range of undergraduate and postgraduate courses in engineering. The collaboration investigates new ways to bring together the strengths and discipline expertise of each institution to the students of both universities, utilising blended teaching and learning approaches. The collaboration brings much change -at the organisational level in the blending of programs, at the staff level in their approaches … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of a robust and reliable technical infrastructure is recognised to be critical in transitioning to enhanced blended learning (Garrison and Kanuka 2004;Moskal, Dziuba, and Hartman 2013;Quinn et al 2012). Our study also highlighted the importance of TEAL spaces, seen to enhance student experience, engagement, collaboration and flexibility (Neill and Etheridge 2008).…”
Section: Institutional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of a robust and reliable technical infrastructure is recognised to be critical in transitioning to enhanced blended learning (Garrison and Kanuka 2004;Moskal, Dziuba, and Hartman 2013;Quinn et al 2012). Our study also highlighted the importance of TEAL spaces, seen to enhance student experience, engagement, collaboration and flexibility (Neill and Etheridge 2008).…”
Section: Institutional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…According to Taylor and Newton (2013), this requires upskilling staff and students in relation to digital literacies. The importance of having clear communication with students to manage expectations around blended learning is also emphasised, including clarity around the roles of learners and teachers (Garrison and Vaughan 2013;Porter et al 2014;Quinn et al 2012). In relation to learning technology support, Moskal, Dziuban, and Hartman (2013) highlighted the need for mid-level organisational capacity enabled by the recruitment of staff with expertise in learning technology and academic staff development, including instructional designers.…”
Section: Institutional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Students are also given multiple opportunities in order to deepen and broaden their knowledge base and integrate that knowledge into their conceptual understandings and actions, both inside and outside of the classroom. This instructional strategy allows the student to spend time exploring and explaining the process, with time for reflection and numerous experiences upon which to synthesize information [38]. According to reference [28], students should be engaged and participating both in and outside of class, as this is crucial to learning and the construction of purposes and meanings.…”
Section: The 5 Es Constructivist Instructional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of online or blended learning delivery is, to a large extent, dependent on the pedagogical knowledge and expertise available in the transition to this new way of learning. This expertise must be developed among all faculty; engineering education is no exception (Quinn, Amer, Lonie, Blackmore, Thompson & Pettigrove, 2012 6 ; Shambhavi & Babu, 2015 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%