Leadership practices by senior position holders in Higher Educational Research Institutes: Stealth power in action?

Abstract

Using Webb's (2008) concept of stealth power and a critical realist perspective, this article identifies leadership practices that obscure the centralisation of power, drawing on data from interviews with 25 academic decision-makers in formal leadership positions in HERIs in Ireland, Italy and Turkey. Its key contribution is the innovative operationalisation of stealth power and the inductive identification of four practices which obscure that centralised power i.e. rhetorical collegiality, agenda control, in-group loyalty and (at a deeper level) the invisibility of gendered power. The purpose of the article is emancipatory: by creating an awareness of these leadership practices, it challenges their persistence. (101 words)

Progress, but at the Expense of Male Power? Institutional Resistance to Gender Equality in an Irish University

“…A good deal has been written about the role of feminist activists in initiating change within the masculinist male dominated contexts of academia (Bendl and Schmidt, 2012;Bendl et al, 2014;O'Connor, 2019). In such contexts, feminist agency may be reflected in a critique of policies and procedures through helping to "name, analyze, and think strategically about institutionalized resistance" (Agócs, 1997: 917).…”

“…Power is required to meet organizational goals. In universities, with the impact of managerialism, there is an increasing centralization of power in the President/Rector and/or in the legitimacy of such centralization (Blackmore and Sachs, 2007;Deem et al, 2008;Lynch et al, 2012;O'Connor, 2014;O'Connor et al, 2019). In this context, many university structures (such as Executive Committee) become largely advisory, while others (such as Academic Council) are limited by lack of access to resources.…”

‘Only Connect!’: Exploring the Critical Dialectical Turn in Leadership Studies

“…Leaders’ power can also be more disguised and concealed. O’Connor et al (2019) examine the strategies of those in senior positions in higher education institutions in Ireland, Italy and Turkey which, they argue, were specifically designed to obscure the centralization of power. Referring to this as ‘stealth power’, they identify four control practices that seek to obscure leaders’ power: rhetorical collegiality, agenda control, in-group loyalty and the invisibility of gendered power.…”

University Management in the Western Sociology of Higher Education

“…Участники международного сравнительного исследования «Гендер, лидерство и управление» (2018-2019) 1 пришли к заключению, что современный университетский менеджмент выработал стратегии адаптации к враждебной академической среде, позволяющие ему эффективно функционировать в ней [28]. Руководители, обладающие лидерским потенци-алом и занимающие формальные властные позиции, создают структуры, формирующие иллюзию отсутствия у них власти.…”