Leadership perspective on the implementation of guidelines on healthcare-associated infections

Abstract

BackgroundLeadership is a key component for infection prevention and control and plays an important role in the implementation of guidelines on healthcare-associated infections. A body of literature exists on healthcare workers’ perspectives on implementing these types of guidelines; however, there is a paucity of data on the leadership perspectives on implementation. This study aims to contribute to the evidence base of leadership perspectives.ObjectiveTo explore the implementation of National Clinical Guidelines pertaining to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile from the leadership angle.SettingHealthcare organisations.ParticipantsClinical and non-clinical leaders.DesignThis research used a mixed-methods approach comprising qualitative individual interviews (n=16) and quantitative surveys (n=51) underpinned by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework.ResultsLeaders recognise the value and innovation of guidelines to support clinical practice. However, they describe barriers to implementation that prevent the full uptake of guidelines, for example, guidelines may present an ideological approach to care which differs from the contextual reality of clinical practice where resources and time are not always available.ConclusionThis research highlighted that guidelines are complex interventions in complex organisations, perhaps leadership could help overcome the challenges posed by this complexity. Leadership may allow a systematic approach to all aspects of implementation despite the variety of challenges faced at different stages of implementation and sustainability of uptake of guidelines over time.

Adherence to screening and management guidelines of maternal Group B Streptococcus colonization in pregnancy

“…Differences in practice patterns of health professionals may be explained by a lack of understanding of workplace protocols and procedures (Sherman & Cohn, 2019). Further, adherence to clinical protocols may be evaluated more or less consistently at various hospitals and possibly with different levels of standards for accountability, responsibility and ownership of clinical guidelines, which may be influenced by the leadership or management of the specific health care facility (Hegarty et al, 2019). The current study's adherence rates to GBS screening guidelines dwindled further when subgroups of the midwifery led care model (MGP, CMP, PM) were examined separately, indicating that the more the care was detached from hospital environments, the lower the screening rate.…”

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards surgical site infection and surveillance: A quasi‐experimental study

“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to look at both knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals on SSI in a study using a pre-test and posttest design. (Anderson et al, 2014;Hegarty et al, 2019;Morikane et al, 2021;Sartelli et al, 2018).…”

Navigating a Pandemic: Leadership Dynamics and Challenges within Infection Prevention and Control Units in Israel

“…However, gaps were found in the implementation of IPC programs, which include lack of guidelines in general and in particular for complex interventions in complex organizations; lack of effectiveness, independence, and applicability; weak behavioral components aimed at removing and addressing environmental, organizational, and individual barriers; lack of a systematic approach that ensures the continuity of the implementation of guidelines over time; limited resources; lack of awareness and understanding; lack of infrastructure and equipment; complex healthcare systems; lack of standardization; poor compliance; human error; patient factors; environmental factors; poor communication and coordination; lack of leadership and support; and lack of research and data [12,[27][28][29].…”