Abstract:JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
“…Stephan May and Seila Aikman for example [10] studies about ILO conventions and education for local communities. Meanwhile, Susan C. Faircloth & John W. Tippeconnic III [11] and Margie Kahukura Hohepa [12] examines the relationship between leadership and education for local communities.…”
Getting an education is the right of every citizen wherever he is and from whatever socio-cGetting an education is the right of every citizen wherever he is and from whatever socio-cultural background he grows. However, in many regions of Indonesia both due to geographical, economic, and socio-cultural issues, the basic rights mentioned above can not be realized. One community group whose children can not go to school because economic and socio-cultural reasons is the Tana Toa or Kajang indigenous people in South Sulawesi. One of the reasons is related to formal school procedures that are contrary to the habits of the Kajang community. One of them is about clothes that Kajang people are generally very sacred black color, while in school must wear red (SD) and blue (SMP). Using ethnographic study to understand Ammatowa Kajang and content analysis, which attempts to analyze educational problems in Tana Toa Kajang, this paper seeks to understand a number of issues in indigenous education. With this method, this paper will identify various educational issues in the Tana Toa Kajang custom area and formulate a number of policies and initiatives that can be undertaken to address the problem.
“…Stephan May and Seila Aikman for example [10] studies about ILO conventions and education for local communities. Meanwhile, Susan C. Faircloth & John W. Tippeconnic III [11] and Margie Kahukura Hohepa [12] examines the relationship between leadership and education for local communities.…”
Getting an education is the right of every citizen wherever he is and from whatever socio-cGetting an education is the right of every citizen wherever he is and from whatever socio-cultural background he grows. However, in many regions of Indonesia both due to geographical, economic, and socio-cultural issues, the basic rights mentioned above can not be realized. One community group whose children can not go to school because economic and socio-cultural reasons is the Tana Toa or Kajang indigenous people in South Sulawesi. One of the reasons is related to formal school procedures that are contrary to the habits of the Kajang community. One of them is about clothes that Kajang people are generally very sacred black color, while in school must wear red (SD) and blue (SMP). Using ethnographic study to understand Ammatowa Kajang and content analysis, which attempts to analyze educational problems in Tana Toa Kajang, this paper seeks to understand a number of issues in indigenous education. With this method, this paper will identify various educational issues in the Tana Toa Kajang custom area and formulate a number of policies and initiatives that can be undertaken to address the problem.
“…US policy makers have long used physical and cultural boundaries to exclude peoples of color, promote assimilation, and protect settler-colonial constructions of property and progress (Brayboy 2005;Quijada Cerecer 2013). In particular, as Faircloth and Tippeconnic (2013) note, "The policies and practices of formal education for American Indians, Alaska Natives, and other Indigenous peoples across the world have been characterized by a colonizing (i.e., hegemonic, assimilationist, acculturating) and oppressive approach to education" (483). Immediate attention and action are important given the widening opportunity gap between white students and youth of color, the devastating influence of violence and racism against Indigenous peoples in bordertowns, the escalating rates of health and economic disparities in American Indian communities, and the accelerated erosion of cultural knowledges.…”
Towns that border American Indian reservations provide important contexts for studying relationships between educational institutions and marginalized communities. This study applies critical discourse methodologies to evaluate policies from districts bordering reservations, districts geographically distant from reservations, and districts located on reservations. Broadly, the study addresses the question, How do school admission policies perpetuate settler-colonialism? Findings reveal bordertown discourse that excludes Indigenous epistemologies, restricts selfdetermination, and defines the function of knowledge and peoples to reinforce Eurocentric power structures. The study offers implications for policy makers, district leaders, and community members working to enhance equity, particularly given increased pressure for school choice expansion. During the westward expansion of the United States, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny sought to justify forced removal of Indigenous peoples from their lands through fortification of Eurocentric ideals surrounding individualism, settlement, and capitalism (Brayboy 2005). 1 For hundreds of diverse Indigenous nations, Manifest Destiny did not advance "expansion"-it signaled a physical and cultural invasion by European and Euro-American settlers and colonists. Within many of today's schools, administrators, school board members, and other "policy insiders" (Bertrand et al. 2015, 3) continue to uphold a form of educational Manifest Destiny through their use of policy discourse that values obedience, individualism, and economic prestige. These settler-colonial definitions of success enact and reinforce institutional racism, which "exists when in-Electronically published
“…We also elevate the unifying elements of Tribal nation building in higher education as a way to contribute to collective struggles across the US and the globe. As other scholars Faircloth and Tippeconnic (2013, p. 485) have noted, “Indigenous peoples have much to learn from each other regarding our efforts to mobilize to effectively change the educational system from one of acculturation, assimilation, isolation, and colonization to one that embraces the cultural and linguistic diversity of Indigenous students, their families, and communities.”…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article discusses the efforts of the Indigenous Knowledge for Effective Education Program (IKEEP), at the University of Idaho, a predominately white institution (PWI) of higher education, located in a state that has historically adopted a hostile stance toward Tribal communities, and its struggle to create space in higher education for intentional support of Indigenous self-determination, sovereignty, and Tribal nation building through the preparation of Indigenous teachers. IKEEP builds on decades long scholarship, institutional programming, and activism among scholars and community members regarding the need to prepare culturally responsive Indigenous teachers and school leaders for transformative change in Indian Country (Brayboy & Castagno, 2009; Carpluk & Leonard, 2017; Castagno et al, 2015; Demmert, 2001; Faircloth & Tippeconnic, 2013). IKEEP’s effort is one of many across North America that challenge and transform higher education to secure a reality of degreed community based educators through a commitment to honor and strengthen the knowledge and experiences Indigenous teacher candidates bring with them to teacher education (Haynes Writer & Oesterreich, 2011; Jacob et al, 2019; Kulago, 2019; Yunkaporta & McGinty, 2009) and a commitment to transformative educational leadership which affirms and legitimizes Indigenous students’ desires to serve their communities, people, and lands.…”
This article discusses the efforts of the Indigenous Knowledge for Effective Education Program (IKEEP), at the University of Idaho, a predominately white institution (PWI) of higher education, and its struggle to create space in higher education for intentional support of Indigenous self-determination, sovereignty, and Tribal nation building through the preparation of Indigenous teachers. In doing so, we examine the contentious and local work of reimagining education, from the bottom up and top down, to develop leaders to serve the needs of Indigenous youth and communities through the vehicle of mainstream institutions. With data from a multiyear ethnographic documentation, we examine the experiences of IKEEP program administration, teacher mentors, and students through the conceptual lens of Tribal nation building in higher education. Our findings underscore how teacher education programs at PWIs need to engage in a radical shift toward seeing Indigenous teachers as nation builders and to prioritize the infrastructure and programmatic collaboration to support them and their communities as such.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.