1986
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-4683.1986.tb00290.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership Behavior of School Principals in Relation to Teacher Stress, Satisfaction, and Performance

Abstract: A study of the relationship between principals' leadership style and teacher stress and satisfaction indicates that teachers' performances are influenced by their perception of principals' behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, even in a declining economy the issue of teacher retention is a critical one for the field of education. Common reasons cited by teachers for leaving the field include: the lack of teacher participation in decision making, minimal career advancement opportunities, low pay, the declining respect accorded to teachers by society, the attitudes of students and parents, inadequacy of administrative support, and the increasingly violent nature of the school environment (Anderson and Iwanicki 1984;Blase, Dederick, and Strathe 1986;Bryne 1998;Farber 1991;Hock 1988). Many of the reasons cited for leaving the profession are also associated with the onset of burnout, a construct that has been linked to attrition (Byrne 1999;Friedman and Farber 1992;Villa and Calvete 2001).…”
Section: Tanya Judd Pucella Is An Assistant Professor Of Education Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, even in a declining economy the issue of teacher retention is a critical one for the field of education. Common reasons cited by teachers for leaving the field include: the lack of teacher participation in decision making, minimal career advancement opportunities, low pay, the declining respect accorded to teachers by society, the attitudes of students and parents, inadequacy of administrative support, and the increasingly violent nature of the school environment (Anderson and Iwanicki 1984;Blase, Dederick, and Strathe 1986;Bryne 1998;Farber 1991;Hock 1988). Many of the reasons cited for leaving the profession are also associated with the onset of burnout, a construct that has been linked to attrition (Byrne 1999;Friedman and Farber 1992;Villa and Calvete 2001).…”
Section: Tanya Judd Pucella Is An Assistant Professor Of Education Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without such reflection, administrators routinely fail to recognize and confront personal values, attitudes, and behaviors that contradict their own espoused theories of effective leadership, and this failure can produce substantial adverse outcomes for individuals and organizations (Argyris, 1990(Argyris, , 1994Bass, 1981). This latter point is especially important in light of countless studies that demonstrate that some school principals typically employ leadership approaches that adversely affect teachers as well as classroom instruction (e.g., Blase et al, 1986;Blase, 1990;Blase & Blase, 1998;Diehl, 1993;Farber, 1991;Malen & Ogawa, 1988;McNeil, 1986); such studies have revealed that, in many cases, principals may not be aware of the consequences of their actions (Adams, 1988, Gunn & Holdaway, 1986High & Achilles, 1986;Reitzug & Cross, 1994). Indeed, few people are without personality characteristics that, in positions of leadership and under various organizational conditions, could result in the mistreatment of others (Ashforth, 1994;Barreca, 1995;Kets de Vries, 1989.…”
Section: Implications For Administrator Preparation and Professional mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of stress studies have linked elements of principals' leadership style and behavior (e.g. nonsupport, assertiveness) to significant stress and burnout in teachers (Adams, 1988;Barnette, 1990;Blase, 1984;Blase et al, 1986;Diehl, 1993;Dunham, 1984;Dworkin et al, 1990). Micropolitical studies have yielded richer descriptions of some aspects of principal mistreatment; these studies describe, among other things, principal favoritism with regard to appointments, promotions, enforcement of rules, evaluation, and recognition and rewards (Blase, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%