Leaders’ Impact on Public Spending Priorities: The Case of the German Laender

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. contribution is an investigation into how political leaders' socioeconomic background influences public spending priorities. Applying sociological theory, we link preferences for the composition of public spending to social status. In contrast to approaches relying on political budget cycles or partisan theory, we find strong and theory-consistent evidence that prime ministers tend to favour fiscal policies supporting the social class in which they are socialised. Governments led by prime ministers from a poor socioeconomic background spend significantly more on social security, education, health, infrastructure, and public safety. Terms of use: Documents inJEL: E62, H75, H76

Do Businessmen Make Good Governors?

“…Other studies document relationships between leaders' educational and occupational backgrounds and fiscal policies (e.g., Hayo and Neumeier, 2012, 2014 as well as countries' constitutional and institutional frameworks (Hayo and Voigt, 2013;Dreher et al, 2009). 5 However, these approaches typically ignore the possibility that the selection of a particular "type" of leader may be related to a country's economic and political situation.…”

Do equalization payments affect subnational borrowing? Evidence from regression discontinuity

“…We also include the fractions of population below 15 and above 65 to control for the importance of local provision of (pre-)schooling services and social and health services for the elderly. The purpose of including these in the analysis is to test whether these two groups of electors benefit over-proportionately from the provision of particular public goods, such as health care or education, in comparison to the rest of the citizenry (Hayo and Neumeier, 2012), which in turn potentially affects incentives of municipalities to overborrow.…”

Who are the ‘ghost’ MPs? Evidence from the French parliament

“…To overcome this issue, two strategies can be adopted. First, several papers reduce the length of the transmission mechanism by studying lower tiers of government (see Jochimsen and Thomasius, 2014, Hayo and Neumeier, 2012, Hayo and Neumeier, 2014, and Moessinger, 2014. This strategy mitigates the problem but does not solve it.…”