2016
DOI: 10.1111/jors.12242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaders, Followers, and Asymmetric Local Tax Policy Diffusion

Abstract: Complementing recent theoretical models of tax competition with endogenous leadership, we empirically model local policy diffusion as a dynamic asymmetric process. Using a setting where local option sales taxes rapidly transitioned from nonexistence to ubiquity, we construct a policy leadership index to classify jurisdictions as leaders or followers. Using models that control for vertical tax competition effects, we show how asymmetric leader–follower dynamics characterize horizontal tax competition over the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These scholars focus on explaining the main characteristics of leaders in creating a better environment for their organizations (in our case, the LGUs). To have an impact on the development of their own region, leaders need to proactively interact with institutions and entrepreneurs, harmonize requests from many different interest groups and organizations and use their expertise in managing the resources (Beer & Clower, 2014; Burge & Rogers, 2016; Horlings & Sotarauta, 2012; Stimson, Stough, & Salazar, 2005). We constuct our forth hypothesis based on this branch of literature.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scholars focus on explaining the main characteristics of leaders in creating a better environment for their organizations (in our case, the LGUs). To have an impact on the development of their own region, leaders need to proactively interact with institutions and entrepreneurs, harmonize requests from many different interest groups and organizations and use their expertise in managing the resources (Beer & Clower, 2014; Burge & Rogers, 2016; Horlings & Sotarauta, 2012; Stimson, Stough, & Salazar, 2005). We constuct our forth hypothesis based on this branch of literature.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a few studies do explore tax competition at the border using panel data. Burge and Rogers (2016) consider the panel dynamics of tax competition for Oklahoma by developing an index to categorize leaders and followers over several decades in the local area tax competition. They find that leaders are less likely to react to changes in statutory tax rates made by other local jurisdictions.…”
Section: The Tax Competition Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, there is no publicly available data source for all county sales taxation rates in the United States over time. 6 The literature has responded by focusing on either single states or regions (Burge and Rogers 2016;Fox 1986;Luna, Bruce, and Hawkins 2007;Walsh and Jones 1988) or by focusing on one time period using cross-sectional analysis (Agrawal 2015). Our approach was to personally collect as many local (county, city, and township) sales taxation rates as possible from each state's respective revenue authority and from legislative documents.…”
Section: F Local and State Sales Taxation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not difficult to imagine that similar strategic responses occur in the enactment of food sales tax policy. In addition, Burge and Rogers () find that there are distinct leaders and followers for local tax policy. They find that followers are actually more likely to raise taxes over their time period, while leaders are less likely to react to followers changes in taxes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%