1993
DOI: 10.1006/viro.1993.1464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader-mRNA Junction Sequences Are Unique for Each Subgenomic mRNA Species in the Bovine Coronavirus and Remain So Throughout Persistent Infection

Abstract: The common leader sequence on bovine coronavirus subgenomic mRNAs and genome was determined. To examine leader-mRNA junction sequences on subgenomic mRNAs, specific oligodeoxynucleotide sets were used in a polymerase chain reaction to amplify junction sequences from either the positive-strand mRNA (eight of nine total identified species) or the negative-strand anti-mRNA (six of the nine species), and sequenced. The mRNA species studied were those for the N, M, S, and HE structural proteins and the 9.5-, 12.7-,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, no variation has been found in transcripts from the MHV mRNA3 promoter, which contains only a single UCUAA element despite the existence of multiple UCUAA motifs in the leader (46). In BCV, where only a single UCUAA element exists in both the genomic leader and at each intergenic site, no variant junction sequences have been found, which is consistent with the idea that the multiple UCUAA motifs in MHV contribute to variable leader-mRNA junction structures (60). With the demonstration that transcripts of cloned DI RNA can undergo replication in helper virus-infected cells, it was observed that transfected DI RNA possessing one type of leader sequence rapidly lost this leader and acquired (within one cycle of virus replication) the leader of the helper virus (37).…”
Section: The Model Of Leader Acquisition During Plus-strand Synthesissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, no variation has been found in transcripts from the MHV mRNA3 promoter, which contains only a single UCUAA element despite the existence of multiple UCUAA motifs in the leader (46). In BCV, where only a single UCUAA element exists in both the genomic leader and at each intergenic site, no variant junction sequences have been found, which is consistent with the idea that the multiple UCUAA motifs in MHV contribute to variable leader-mRNA junction structures (60). With the demonstration that transcripts of cloned DI RNA can undergo replication in helper virus-infected cells, it was observed that transfected DI RNA possessing one type of leader sequence rapidly lost this leader and acquired (within one cycle of virus replication) the leader of the helper virus (37).…”
Section: The Model Of Leader Acquisition During Plus-strand Synthesissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…S2) except the TRSs for all ORF3 and the E gene of HKU8. It has been reported that the leader TRS can also join the body segment at an unusual consensus sequence preceding the ORFs without the presence of the core sequence (Hofmann et al, 1993). However, we were not able to demonstrate this in these bat viruses because none of these viruses could be cultured in vitro and we have no means of obtaining sufficient viral RNA for detailed investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…According to this scenario, CRCoV 4182 may descent from a mutation of an ancestral bovine-like strain that exhibited the full-length 11 kDa protein, whereas CRCoV 240/05 and G9142 presumably descended from a different ancestor that showed the two distinct non-structural proteins. Furthermore, nsp 4.9 and 4.8 are not present in the bovine-derivative HCoV-OC43 (Vijgen et al, 2005) and their function is yet unknown in BCoV itself where the 4.9 kDa protein could not been expressed due to the absence of a start codon in its mRNA (Hofmann et al, 1993). Obviously, it cannot be ruled out that the elevated level of genomic differences among the accessory genes is due to the high frequency of mutations/deletions that occur during CoV evolution, rather than to RNA recombination events that characterize CoV ecology (Lai et al, 1985;Makino et al, 1986;Banner and Lai, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%