2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
260
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
15
260
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When the quality level of LMX is high, individuals will receive more formal and informal rewards (Sparrowe & Liden 1997), opportunities, autonomy, and more of the leader's time (Graen & Uhl-Bien 1995). In exchange for the aforementioned, employees will feel obligated to contribute to the advancement of the leader's agenda and thereby undertake challenging and difficult tasks (Graham & van Witteloostuijn 2010;Volmer, Spurk & Niessen 2012). This will result in a greater investment of resources in the work domain (Graen & Uhl-Bien 1995).…”
Section: The Interplay Among Individual and Interpersonal Factors Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the quality level of LMX is high, individuals will receive more formal and informal rewards (Sparrowe & Liden 1997), opportunities, autonomy, and more of the leader's time (Graen & Uhl-Bien 1995). In exchange for the aforementioned, employees will feel obligated to contribute to the advancement of the leader's agenda and thereby undertake challenging and difficult tasks (Graham & van Witteloostuijn 2010;Volmer, Spurk & Niessen 2012). This will result in a greater investment of resources in the work domain (Graen & Uhl-Bien 1995).…”
Section: The Interplay Among Individual and Interpersonal Factors Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees in high-quality LMX relationships receive more rewards, support, task-related resources, and information about desired behavior from leaders, which is related to receptiveness and support for creative work (Amabile 1988), than those in low-quality LMX relationship (Dienesch & Liden 1986;Graen & Cashman 1975). Thus, when leaders are supportive (Černe, Jaklič & Škerlavaj 2013) and the quality of LMX is high, individuals will be more creative (Volmer, Spurk & Niessen 2012), even in situations when they will experience negative emotions due to low SWFB and high time pressure. In light of the above, we argue that when perceived time pressure is high and SWFB is low, at the same time the quality of LMX relationship has to be high for individuals to be highly creative.…”
Section: H2a: There Is a Three-way Interaction Between Perceived Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Nekoeimoghadm et al (2010), senior and middle managers of educational hospitals in Kerman mostly used employee-oriented leadership style [12]. Leadership style is a collection of attitudes, attributes, and skills of managers which is formed based on the values, trust in employees, leadership tendencies, security feeling in different situations, and appropriate leadership style is shaped based on specific conditions, special situations, and the culturing governing the organization [19]. In fact, the situation and conditions are the main determinants of leadership effectiveness [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the findings in the current study, there was no significant statistical relationship between leadership style and career independence. Volmer et al (2012) in their studies showed that there is relationship between leadership style and career independence [19]. Ng and Feldman (2015) concluded that career independence has positive relationship with job performance and its outcome, and negative relationship with the organizational obstacles and limitations [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam kondisi autonomi kerja rendah, individu memiliki sedikit kontrol atas bagaimana untuk melakukan tugas (Zhou, 1998). Rendahnya autonomi kerja membatasi pilihan cara dan metode kerja (Volmer et al, 2012). Dalam kondisi ini, pengaruh dukungan rekan kerja pada kreativitas karyawan akan menjadi rendah.…”
Section: Peran Pemoderasi Autonomi Kerjaunclassified