2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX's influence on OCB and turnover intention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
187
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
187
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This view holds that leaders, through the differentiated relationship they form with members, foster relative standing within the group (Harris et al, 2014). In contrast to RLMX, what matters is not the sign or direction of the difference but the absolute value because, following a distinction made by Harrison and Klein (2007), LMXRS is a measure of separation rather than disparity (Harris et al, 2014). This distinction becomes clearer when the computation of LMXRS is understood: the formula, …”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This view holds that leaders, through the differentiated relationship they form with members, foster relative standing within the group (Harris et al, 2014). In contrast to RLMX, what matters is not the sign or direction of the difference but the absolute value because, following a distinction made by Harrison and Klein (2007), LMXRS is a measure of separation rather than disparity (Harris et al, 2014). This distinction becomes clearer when the computation of LMXRS is understood: the formula, …”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, LMXRS is intended to serve as a proxy for a psychological process through which a sense for one's relational separation is determined. Harris et al (2014) interpret this process in relation to the group engagement model, such that what matters is not the degree of disparity in social comparison but the degree of separation from the group with which a member would identify. In terms of operationalization, however, the crucial difference between RLMX and LMXRS can be illustrated with a figure representing two networks of LMX relationships.…”
Section: Rlmx Research Modeling Lmx Differentiation By Means Of Rlmxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang et al (2013) showed that when an organization promoted knowledge management, the introduction of knowledge management was not the completion of the program; instead, the outcome after introducing the knowledge management should be evaluated, and a feedback system should be formed for the continuous development of the knowledge management system. Harris et al (2014) concluded that knowledge management aimed to extract major data of knowledge in the organization from different sources for storing and memorizing the data for the use of organizational members and the organization innovation to promote the competitive advantages of the enterprise. Sussan (2012) indicated that the primary condition for an enterprise creating high organization innovation was to establish a sharing corporate culture and environment.…”
Section: Research On Leadership Behavior and Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge management Harris et al (2014) pointed out knowledge management as the essential measures for engaging in information collection, decision, and action to keenly cope with changes of external environment and practicing flexible management to cope with distinct situations. Meanwhile, it was also a comprehensive strategy for the constant innovation of an enterprise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the necessity of turnover rate for the growth of an enterprise, improper or frequent turnover rate would influence the quality of customer services and result in the gap in experience inheritance of organizational members. Employees consider organizational commitment, leadership styles of supervisors, and organizational culture in an enterprise as the factors in the job satisfaction [1][2] [3]. Past research pointed out the higher organizational commitment of employees, the lower turnover intention, the better work attitudes, and the higher job satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%