Oxford Handbooks Online 2014
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199326174.013.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader–Member Exchange (LMX): Construct Evolution, Contributions, and Future Prospects for Advancing Leadership Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we find that workplace ostracism decreases job embeddedness (see Figure ) and increases voluntary turnover (see Figure ), but only for employees with relatively positive LMX. Whereas existing research seems to suggest that LMX is always good (Day & Miscenko, ), a resource complementarity perspective suggests that this may not be always the case. As prior studies have suggested (e.g., Sherony & Green, ) and our current research shows as well (i.e., the negative relationship between workplace ostracism and LMX), positive co‐worker relations and a high‐quality LMX tend to be found together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Specifically, we find that workplace ostracism decreases job embeddedness (see Figure ) and increases voluntary turnover (see Figure ), but only for employees with relatively positive LMX. Whereas existing research seems to suggest that LMX is always good (Day & Miscenko, ), a resource complementarity perspective suggests that this may not be always the case. As prior studies have suggested (e.g., Sherony & Green, ) and our current research shows as well (i.e., the negative relationship between workplace ostracism and LMX), positive co‐worker relations and a high‐quality LMX tend to be found together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the contemporary world, on the other hand, LMX has been considered as the most influential leadership theory for the past four decades that deals with the relationship oriented context within organizations (Rice, 1999). However, major research evidences regarding LMX and outcomes emerge from the developed countries (Day & Miscenko, 2016) whereas, lesser studies in non-developing countries showed a substantial difference in leadership outcomes for both the contexts (Anand, Hu, Liden, & Vidyarthi, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables us to derive theoretical distinctions from a parallel domain, with the aim of mapping the theoretical landscape on social support at the workplace and position our study in it. One useful theoretical distinction can be found in Day and Miscenko's () work about positive leadership theory, as support of others is often explicitly or implicitly part of it. The researchers identified four main theoretical approaches to positive leadership: (a) traits or characteristics theories, focusing on identifying stable core features involved in the phenomenon; (b) situational theories, focusing on identifying moderating factors that enhance or inhibit the effect associated with the phenomenon; (c) motivational theories, focusing on identifying symbolic, emotional, and self‐concept elements associated with the phenomenon; and (d) information processing theories, aspiring to understand the enactment and interpretation of the phenomenon (with specific emphasis on categorization and prototype‐matching processes).…”
Section: Theoretical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%