2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader information seeking, team performance and team innovation: Examining the roles of team reflexivity and cooperative outcome interdependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When followers are influenced by a humble leader who is engaged in a team reflection process, they offer a source of competitive advantages for the sustainable development of the team or organization ( Schippers et al, 2015 ). As an important factor to indicate team sustainability, team innovation, which addresses the challenges and shocks that teams encounter ( Hirst et al, 2009 ), can be prompted by the processes of team reflexivity ( Schippers et al, 2015 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Indeed, Carter and West (1998) emphasize that task reflexivity is positively related to participation in decision-making, flexible strategies and objectives, and positive relational energy among followers, thus promoting a team’s effectiveness and innovation.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When followers are influenced by a humble leader who is engaged in a team reflection process, they offer a source of competitive advantages for the sustainable development of the team or organization ( Schippers et al, 2015 ). As an important factor to indicate team sustainability, team innovation, which addresses the challenges and shocks that teams encounter ( Hirst et al, 2009 ), can be prompted by the processes of team reflexivity ( Schippers et al, 2015 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Indeed, Carter and West (1998) emphasize that task reflexivity is positively related to participation in decision-making, flexible strategies and objectives, and positive relational energy among followers, thus promoting a team’s effectiveness and innovation.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results conveyed that the information-seeking attitude of the leader positively relates to team innovation and team performance via team reflexivity. Further, the outcomes of cooperative interdependence moderates the link between leader information seeking and team reflexivity, such that the relationship is stronger when cooperative outcomes interdependence high and weaker when it is low (Wang et al, 2020). Moreover, Kuenzi et al (2019) drew their research on SIPT and social learning theory to conceptualize that employees exhibit less UB (behavior is not rewarded) because of ethical climate (social information).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this graphical representation, values have been extracted in Table 3, representing path coefficients with critical ratio (CR = Estimate/SE) and p-values. Suppose an estimate is represented by a negative value, the exogenous and endogenous estimates have a negative direction between them, and if the estimate has no sign, then by default, it represents the positive sign, which means exogenous and endogenous estimates have a positive direction between them (Caputo et al, 2019;Chang et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These known factors include leadership behavior, boundary management, social interaction, and conflict resolution (Savelsbergh et al, 2010). This group of factors translates into information sharing (Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009), task and relationship conflict (Kanadlı et al, 2020), team cohesion (Muthiane et al, 2015), leadership (Morgeson et al, 2010), collaboration knowledge and absorptive capacity (Zhang et al, 2011), team mental model (Lim & Klein, 2006), team composition (Zarzu et al, n.d.), trust in the leader (Wang et al, 2020), team diversity (Yeager & Nafukho, 2012), role diversity (Batenburg et al, 2013), cognitive ability (Salas et al, 2008), and relationship orientation (Saemundsson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introduction *mentioning
confidence: 99%