2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
150
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 263 publications
3
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We posit that understanding the factors that influence these differences in behaviors is critical for understanding followers' attitudinal reactions toward conscientious leaders. Extending work suggesting that the relationships between traits and behaviors can vary significantly as a result of one's subjective appraisals of a situation (e.g., Rauthmann et al, ; Zaccaro, Green, Dubrow, & Kolze, ), we argue that the leader conscientiousness‐leader adaptability relationship is conditioned by leader role authenticity (i.e., when a role allows someone to act in ways reflecting her/his “true self”; Sheldon, Ryan, Rawsthorne, & Ilardi, ).…”
Section: Are Followers Satisfied With Conscientious Leaders? the Modementioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We posit that understanding the factors that influence these differences in behaviors is critical for understanding followers' attitudinal reactions toward conscientious leaders. Extending work suggesting that the relationships between traits and behaviors can vary significantly as a result of one's subjective appraisals of a situation (e.g., Rauthmann et al, ; Zaccaro, Green, Dubrow, & Kolze, ), we argue that the leader conscientiousness‐leader adaptability relationship is conditioned by leader role authenticity (i.e., when a role allows someone to act in ways reflecting her/his “true self”; Sheldon, Ryan, Rawsthorne, & Ilardi, ).…”
Section: Are Followers Satisfied With Conscientious Leaders? the Modementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Integrating socioanalytic theory and person-situation perspectives, Hogan and Roberts (2000) suggested that individuals' behaviors are shaped by both the broad underlying motives of traits and the extent to which they believe a particular social role accommodates that pursuit. A substantive body of related scholarship similarly supports the notion that trait expressions vary as a function of individuals' subjective appraisals of their role (Hooijberg, 1996;Rauthmann, Sherman, & Funder, 2015;Zaccaro et al, 2018). To this end, the degree to which individuals feel authentic in a specific role (i.e., role authenticity) is a potentially important factor shaping the relationships between traits and behaviors (Sheldon et al, 1997).…”
Section: Joint Effects Of Leader Conscientiousness and Leader Role mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, there are many other organizational constructs and personal features that it is possible to investigate and incorporate into the model. For example, future research could add data exploring the relationship between leadership styles and leader traits, topic that has been well examined by different researchers (i.e., Bono & Judge, ; De Hoog, Den Hartog, & Koopman, ; De Vries, ; Judge & Bono, ; Lumpkin & Achen, ; Posner, ; Swain, ; Zaccaro, Green, Dubrow, & Kolze, ). Similarly, it is possible to investigate the relationships between leadership styles and innovation, creativity, work attitudes, or the distribution of leadership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, leadership presence implicates the study of performance management when presence is behaviorally defined and operationalized in ways that facilitate the measurement of desired outcomes (Schleicher, Baumann, Sullivan, Levy, Hargrove & Barros-Rivera, 2018). Individual differences, as examined in the field of differential psychology, also relate to the study and practice of leadership presence (Zaccaro, Green, Dubrow & Kolze, 2018) as leaders express themselves using different styles and work preferences. Consider also the work relating to work identity and leadership (Kyratsis, Atun, Phillips, Tracey, & George, 2017;van Knippenberg, 2016) with the notion that a leader's presence and identity at work are being shaped over time and influenced by situational contexts (Kerns, 2018a;Lord & Chui, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%